Breaking NewsSponsored by The Sullivan Auto Group

Subscribe: Home Delivery Special!
Last Updated 4:27 pm PDT Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A10
UC Davis research assistant Eric Sommerauer watches the monitors of underwater cameras recording young chinook salmon swimming against the flow inside the flume. Sacramento Bee/ Lezlie Sterling
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers insists that virtually all vegetation be removed from California levees to protect their structural integrity.
But a novel study at UC Davis -- using the largest hydraulic research flume west of the Mississippi -- is bolstering years of scientific findings that show trees and shrubs may actually improve flood safety.
For decades, the corps allowed large vegetation on California levees, in coordination with wildlife agencies, for the sake of habitat. Unlike many other major American rivers, California's big rivers are squeezed into narrow channels, making levees themselves vital habitat for fish, birds, other wildlife and people.
But in February, the corps enforced strict national vegetation guidelines in California for the first time. These rules essentially allow nothing but short grass to grow on levees.
Thirty-two California levee districts were told in February that they failed the standard. More are likely to fail when another inspection occurs this fall, including Sacramento's urban levees.
The corps is updating its national policy but the final outcome is uncertain, forcing levee and wildlife officials into a waiting game. It is unclear if the corps is taking into account the new UC Davis findings.
In the meantime, on June 12, the corps released interim guidance for local levee districts that essentially reinforces existing national policy. Only short grass can grow on the land side of levees. Nothing over two inches in diameter can grow on the water side.
Districts must remove all vegetation by March 30, 2008, or the corps says it will cut access to millions of dollars in federal levee funds available following flooding.
If districts do comply, hundreds of miles of California riverside habitat could be wiped out.
"It really is sort of a recipe for disaster in levee maintenance here," said Mike Hardesty, president of the California Central Valley Flood Control Association, which represents dozens of levee districts.
The corps policy stems from a belief that plants hinder levee inspection and reduce flood channel capacity. The agency also believes roots destabilize levees and create a path for seepage.
But years of research have shown just the opposite.
In a flume that simulates a floodway such as the Yolo Bypass, a team at the UC Davis Amorocho Hydraulics Laboratory runs giant pumps to move water across a field of willow shrubs anchored underwater. Sensors and cameras monitor water flow and plant movement.
The flume -- about 80 feet long with a cross-section similar to a standard doorway -- also is home to dozens of young chinook salmon, monitored by cameras peering though glass panels.
The study found that the willows flatten against the ground surface as flows increase, offering little resistance to water flow. The bent shrubs protect the soil from erosion and create a bottom layer of slower water. The young chinook salmon seek refuge in this calm bottom layer among the flattened willows.
"The benefits start kicking in at high flows when flood risk is worse," said Stefan Lorenzato, who is leading the study along with UC Davis researchers. Lorenzato is a watershed management coordinator at the California Department of Water Resources. "It's implying that plants may be helping us, not hurting us."
He acknowledged the study simulates a floodway and not a levee system, where flows are stronger and more variable. But he said it provides the first hard data on plant behavior in a flood.
Engineers now rely on assumptions in computer models to decide how plants affect flooding.
But Joe Countryman, president of MBK Engineers, a Sacramento firm that designs flood-control projects, said these models don't account for the reduced friction that occurs when plants "lay down" under high flows. Nor do they consider that plants may reduce erosion.
"To me, this is pretty exciting research," said Countryman. "Really, one of the biggest threats to the flood system is not (channel) capacity, it's erosion. To the extent this demonstrates that plants slow erosion, that's a real plus."
Continue reading on next page
About the writer:
- The Bee's Matt Weiser can be reached at (916) 321-1264 or mweiser@sacbee.com.
Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map | Advertise | Guide to The Bee | Bee Jobs | FAQs | RSS
Contact Us | e-edition | Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | E-newsletters | Sacbeemail | Archives
sacbee.com | Sacramento.com | Capitol Alert | SacMomsClub.com | SacPaws.com | SacWineRegion.com
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee
2100 Q St. P.O. Box 15779 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 321-1000