Subscribe: Home Delivery Special!

sacbee.com Web
Shopping Yellow Pages

Many 'green' claims may be shady

Survey suggests consumers should take a hard look at eco-friendly credentials.

By Darrell Smith - dvsmith@sacbee.com

Last Updated 12:41 am PST Friday, November 23, 2007
Story appeared in BUSINESS section, Page D1

Print | | | |

Products from air fresheners to toothpastes lure consumers with promises of eco-friendly ingredients, but can they back up their boasts?

A new survey suggests that many companies' green claims are as authentic as a $20 Gucci handbag at a flea market.

Virtually all – 99 percent – of more than 1,000 products plucked from supermarkets and box stores falsely claimed green credentials, according to "The Six Sins of Greenwashing," a survey by Pennsylvania-based environmental marketing firm TerraChoice Environmental Marketing Inc.

Neither the products nor their manufacturers were identified, but products ranged from deodorant to oven cleaner.

"Consumers are inundated with products that make green claims. Some are accurate, while others are just plain fibbing to sell products," said Scott McDougall, president of TerraChoice, in a prepared statement, adding that the goal is to educate consumers so "they can buy green with confidence."

Consumers should look for:

The Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off: Nearly 1,000 of 1,018 products suggest a product is better merely because it contains a so-called green ingredient – recycled paper, for instance – but fail to mention that the product contains a hazardous material.

The Sin of No Proof: A quarter of the products claimed to be "organic" but with no verifiable certification.

The Sin of Vagueness: Eleven percent of products claimed to be 100 percent natural, but that alone does not mean a product is "eco-friendly" since many naturally occurring substances are hazardous.

The Sin of Irrelevance: In labeling on 78 products, manufacturers patted themselves on the back for leaving out hazardous ingredients that were banned by law.

The Sin of the Lesser of Two Evils: Researchers singled out makers of organic cigarettes and environmentally friendly pesticides because their products pose a hazard but are marketed as a healthy alternative. Seventeen products fell into this category.

The Sin of Fibbing: About 10 manufacturers falsely claimed that they met a recognized environmental standard but did not.

The survey's findings inspired the marketing firm to coin a new word, "greenwashing." TerraChoice staff defines it as the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service.

"We want consumers to leave with a healthy skepticism regarding environmental claims," said Scot Case, TerraChoice's vice president and one of the survey authors. "People are using their resources to buy greener products. We hope they will be much harder to fool."

Drawing attention to potentially misleading green claims is a good idea, said Ronald Bailey, a policy analyst at Reason Foundation, a libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C. Yet he questioned how concerned consumers should be.

"I'm not going to disagree with a lot of what they say. Consumers are interested in this information, and it's important for business to give them that kind of information," Bailey said. "But there are so many dimensions of green. Who decides what's OK and how worried should we be about them?"

TerraChoice hopes to put pressure on manufacturers to develop standards to back up their environmental credentials and adhere to "ecolabeling" programs such as Canada's EcoLogo.

The program, launched in 1988 and similar to the federal EnergyStar energy conservation program, helps consumers identify products that are less harmful to the environment.

Not coincidentally, TerraChoice has managed EcoLogo since 1995, certifying companies to receive EcoLogo recognition. The firm disclosed the connection in its news release. The relationship concerns Bailey.

"Obviously, they have people they prefer. I think they prefer their clients. Bottom line, they're saying go with the labeling firms we recommend," Bailey said. "They're saying, 'Let us make the judgment about trade-offs. Don't worry, we'll decide for you.'"

As for Bailey: "I never look for whether a product is green or not green. That's irrelevant. I look for whether it works and if it's too expensive."

About the writer:

  • Call The Bee's Darrell Smith, (916) 321-1040.
Recommend this story at Yahoo! Buzz:

The Sacramento Bee Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSCRIBE NOW!


Most Popular
 

SUBSCRIBE NOW!




Top Jobs

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

 
 



News  |  Sports  |  Business  |  Politics  |  Opinion  |  Entertainment  |  Living Here  |  Travel  |  Blogs  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Classifieds/Shopping  

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map | Advertise | Guide to The Bee | Bee Jobs | FAQs | RSS

Contact Us | e-edition | Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | E-newsletters | Sacbeemail | Archives

sacbee.com | Sacramento.com | Capitol Alert | SacMomsClub.com | SacPaws.com | SacWineRegion.com

Copyright © The Sacramento Bee
2100 Q St.  P.O. Box 15779  Sacramento, CA 95816  (916) 321-1000