Breaking NewsSponsored by The Sullivan Auto Group

Subscribe: Home Delivery Special!
Published 5:21 am PST Thursday, December 20, 2007
Story appeared in MAIN NEWS section, Page A1
Ratcheting up a fight between Washington and Sacramento over global warming, the Bush administration Wednesday blocked a landmark California law aimed at curtailing greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.
The decision by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Stephen Johnson doesn't mean the end of the dispute. Within minutes of the announcement, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown, who had been bracing for the EPA's rejection, promised to sue the federal government.
Johnson said California's law was pre-empted by the new national energy bill signed earlier Wednesday by President Bush. That bill increases fuel economy from 27.5 mpg to 35 mpg by 2020, resulting in "some of the largest greenhouse gas emission cuts in our nation's history," Johnson said.
That's far more effective than "a partial, state-by-state approach," he said in a conference call with reporters. "It is a global problem that requires a clear, national solution."
But California officials and their allies in the environmental movement argued that the state's law, passed in 2002, was stronger. It would cut emissions to roughly the same level as required by the U.S. law but would do so by 2016, or four years sooner a critical difference given the urgency of the problem, they said. It also provides for deeper cuts in emissions in future years.
As for the claim about a piecemeal approach, state officials said other states can and often do follow California's lead, creating a bandwagon effect that sweeps the nation.
California is the only state with the right to set its own air emissions standards, but it needs a waiver from the EPA to do so. Once a waiver is granted as it has been more than 40 times in the past 40 years other states can piggyback on California's move and adopt identical rules. Already 12 states had adopted copycat laws on greenhouse gas emissions; five or six more were in the process of doing so.
Now all are on hold.
Wednesday's decision marked the first time the EPA had flatly refused California's waiver request, said a spokesman for the state's Air Resources Board.
"It is disappointing that the federal government is standing in our way and ignoring the will of tens of millions of people across the nation," Schwarzenegger said in a press release. "We will continue to fight this battle."
The California law, AB 1493, was supposed to take effect with the 2009 model year. It is key to the state's crusade against climate change. Cutting motor vehicle emissions would account for one-sixth of the greenhouse gas reductions required by another bill, AB 32, the high-profile global warming law signed by Schwarzenegger last year.
Johnson said he called Schwarzenegger Wednesday afternoon to inform him of his decision to block AB 1493 and to thank him for California's leadership on global warming, which he said helped nudge Congress to enact the energy bill. Schwarzenegger's press secretary, Aaron McClear, said the call came 30 minutes before Johnson's announcement. He called the conversation "terse."
Other officials were swift in their condemnation. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called it "disgraceful" and said the new national energy bill doesn't give the EPA the right to abandon its responsibility to regulate air pollution. Feinstein was a key player in crafting the federal law.
"We're deeply disappointed that the administrator chose to deny the waiver, and we're even more discouraged that he did it on such flimsy grounds," said Mary Nichols, chairman of the state Air Resources Board.
Environmentalists said it was vital California be allowed to continue in its role as environmental trailblazer. By rejecting the waiver, the administration is "sticking their thumb in the eye of 18 governors from red and blue states," said attorney David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council, which helped California fend off lawsuits filed by the world's automakers challenging the state law.
Continue reading on next page
About the writer:
- Call The Bee's Dale Kaler, (916) 321-1066.
Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSCRIBE NOW!
WHAT HAPPENED
For the first time, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rejects a California request to set air pollution rules. The state wants to require a 30 percent cut in automobile greenhouse gas emissions by 2016.
EPA chief Stephen Johnson justifies the decision by arguing that California had not shown that it faces a "compelling and extraordinary" threat from global warming.
WHAT'S NEXT
California plans to sue the federal government "as soon as possible."
Legal experts say a ruling on the suit would come next summer at the earliest.
The state Air Resources Board now will consider other ways to cut climate-warming emissions from vehicles.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map | Advertise | Guide to The Bee | Bee Jobs | FAQs | RSS
Contact Us | e-edition | Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | E-newsletters | Sacbeemail | Archives
sacbee.com | Sacramento.com | Capitol Alert | SacMomsClub.com | SacPaws.com | SacWineRegion.com
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee
2100 Q St. P.O. Box 15779 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 321-1000