Breaking NewsSponsored by The Sullivan Auto Group

Subscribe: Home Delivery Special!
Last Updated 6:54 am PDT Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Story appeared in SCENE section, Page E1
Deep, esoteric chin-pulling is not the reaction you'd expect from people who watch "The Daily Show With Jon Stewart."
I laugh, therefore I am?
Not exactly.
But then, Jason Holt is not your average viewer of Comedy Central's popular fake-news program. An assistant professor at Acadia University in Canada and the author of two academic books, Holt processes the pop-culture world through a philosophical prism.
So, to him, Stewart and television cohort Stephen Colbert are nothing less than the Socrates and Plato of our time.
Really. He's serious about studying these TV funnymen. In fact, Holt enlisted the help of 20 other academics or "Senior Philosophical Correspondents," to ape a "Daily Show" shtick to put their high brows together and muse on the significance of all things Stewart.
The result: "The Daily Show and Philosophy" (Blackwell, $17.95, 270 pages), a compendium of essays that consider whether Stewart and his merry band of fakecasters are the public intellectuals of today, whether "truthiness" is indeed a higher form of truth, and just how edifying those "Moments of Zen" really are.
"I sent out a call for papers for this project and got upward of 50 proposals," says Holt, on the phone recently from Nova Scotia. "I couldn't take all of them for the book. But that shows you the level of interest."
Hmm. "The Daily Show" popular among philosophers? Who knew?
And what, pray tell, would the congenitally snarky Stewart think of all this?
Well, we never heard back from Stewart's people, but Holt is willing to venture a guess.
"Outwardly, (Stewart) would and perhaps should mock it," he says. "He could use this kind of thing as grist for his mill, because he always sells himself short. He underplays the cultural importance of the show.
"But if he reflected on it, he might see that we might be on to something."
The book travels all over the philosophical landscape, although the scholars spend most of their time comparing Stewart to Socrates, the classical Greek thinker who founded Western philosophy, and Diogenes, the leader of the ancient Greek "cynics" school.
Just as Socrates' and Diogenes' reason-over-emotion doctrines served as an antidote to the sophists and rhetoricians of their day, Stewart's nightly reports combat the dissembling of politicians and the blathering of mainstream media's so-called "chattering class." At least, that's Holt's thesis.
And then, there's this: Socrates and Diogenes were as snarky then as Stewart is now.
Diogenes once lived in a bathtub to show citizens the folly of the pursuit of wealth and comfort. And Socrates was known for comically feigning ignorance "I know that I am intelligent, because I know that I know nothing" to dissect an opponent's argument.
Indeed, this use of "Socratic irony" is alive and well today in Stewart's interviews, according to Indiana State philosophy professor Judith Barad.
"(Stewart) shares Socrates' appreciation of one-on-one encounters, and he resembles the ancient sage when he pretends to be confused and requests explanations that underscore how ridiculous someone else sounds," Barad writes in her essay. "Socrates showed them that people may have high positions and power, yet at the same time be irrational and deeply confused."
Barad even speculates that Socrates would have "made one of those awestruck faces Jon Stewart is famous for."
Essayists Steven Michels and Michael Ventimiglia of Sacred Heart University write that Stewart is like Socrates in that the late-night host allows people to embarrass themselves by "letting them fall on their own swords." Socrates did it through his dialogues; Stewart through TV sound bites.
As an example, the essayists compare Socrates' dismissive dialogue with the out-of-touch religious leader Euthyphro over the meaning of piety with a "Daily Show" snippet in which Stewart mocks Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens' uninformed speech about the proposed Net Neutrality Act.
After a clip in which Stevens shows little knowledge about the Web, Stewart pounces: "You don't seem to know jack ... about computers or the Internet. But hey, that's OK; you're just the guy in charge of regulating it, so what difference does it make?"
Continue reading on next page
About the writer:
- Call The Bee's Sam McManis at (916) 321-1145. Read his blog postings at 21Q (www.SacTicket.com/21q).
Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map | Advertise | Guide to The Bee | Bee Jobs | FAQs | RSS
Contact Us | e-edition | Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | E-newsletters | Sacbeemail | Archives
sacbee.com | Sacramento.com | Capitol Alert | SacMomsClub.com | SacPaws.com | SacWineRegion.com
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee
2100 Q St. P.O. Box 15779 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 321-1000