More Information

  • Thursday's decision was the latest ruling by Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch regarding state furloughs:

    • Dec. 31: The judge ordered the Schwarzenegger administration to stop furloughing thousands of state workers who are members of three public-sector unions, including the biggest, Service Employees International Union Local 1000.

    • Thursday: The judge expanded on his Dec. 31 ruling to all workers in non-general fund departments, not just those represented by the unions that sued, and ordered back pay for tens of thousands of state workers.
Capitol and California - Furloughs
0 comments | Print

Judge orders back pay for some furloughed California workers

Published: Friday, Feb. 26, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page 1A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Sep. 7, 2010 - 2:22 pm

An Alameda County judge on Thursday ordered back pay for tens of thousands of state workers who he had previously ruled were illegally furloughed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Judge Frank Roesch told the state to "immediately pay all employees of respondent departments and agencies their full salary without any reductions … and cease and desist the furlough of such employees."

Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear said Thursday night that the governor would appeal.

"Friday, Monday at the latest," McLear said. "That will stay the ruling. Ultimately that will be decided by the state Supreme Court."

If upheld on appeal, the judge's order would cost the state more than $1 billion that officials thought they would save when furloughs were instituted a year ago.

Roesch's decision affects employees in nearly 70 departments that receive all or most of their budget money from sources other than the state's general fund, regardless of their union affiliation.

Neither the state nor the unions have yet figured out exactly how much pay those workers have lost to furloughs since the policy started a year ago with two unpaid days off per month. Schwarzenegger added a third "Furlough Friday" in July.

At that time, government figured the payroll savings budgeted from Schwarzenegger's thrice-monthly furloughs would be approximately $2.5 billion for the 2009-10 fiscal year – from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. About $1 billion of that was expected to come from furloughing non-general fund state employees.

The distinction has been a sore spot for state workers and their unions, because the general fund, not special funds, is the source of California's serial budget deficits. Officials estimate that the general fund, proposed at $83 billion for fiscal 2010-11, will be about $20 billion short by the end of that year without deep program cuts or tax hikes.

Specially funded departments such as the Department of Transportation, the Employment Development Department and the California Highway Patrol receive most or all of their dollars from dedicated fees, the federal government or other sources.

Union lawyers successfully argued in Roesch's court during a November hearing that furloughing employees in those departments is arbitrary, harms government operations and violates the law.

The governor's lawyers unsuccessfully argued that furloughs have to be applied evenly to be fair and that savings in special fund departments helped the state's overall cash position.

On New Year's Eve Roesch issued a ruling that the furloughs were illegal, writing that spreading the pain of pay cuts across the state work force was not "rationally related to any government purpose."

"When the only justification underpinning the furlough of these employees that remains is 'labor parity,' the court cannot do otherwise than to conclude that respondents (in the administration) have abused their discretion," he wrote.

On Thursday, Roesch not only settled the question of back pay, he said the judgment applied to all workers in non-general fund departments, not just those represented by the unions that sued.

After the New Year's Eve ruling, union lawyers asked Roesch to expand his judgment to all furloughed state workers, including those paid through the general fund. His Thursday opinion denied that request.

The Schwarzenegger administration's appeal of the ruling will stay the order during the next stage of litigation unless the unions can persuade the court to lift the stay.

Yvonne Walker, president of the Service Employees International Union Local 1000, said the back-pay order would apply to about 53,000 of the 95,000 state workers the union represents. Unions representing state legal professionals and doctors and dentists also sued and won with variations of the special funds argument.

"We're going to fight the stay," Walker said, predicting that state workers would be off furlough and receive their back pay sooner rather than later. "And we believe we'll win."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call Jon Ortiz, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 321-1043.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals