Capitol and California - State Politics - Arnold Schwarzenegger
0 comments | Print

Schwarzenegger budget plan would borrow from CalPERS

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 30, 2010 - 10:19 am | Page 1A

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has privately proposed borrowing $2 billion from the state's giant pension fund to help bridge California's $19 billion budget deficit.

The plan would take the money as an advance against future savings from pension cuts, according to sources close to the negotiations who would not be identified because of the sensitive nature of the talks.

The Republican governor is demanding that lawmakers reduce pension benefits for newly hired state workers back to pre-1999 levels as part of any budget agreement he signs. The Legislature and Gov. Gray Davis that year authorized larger pension benefits under the assumption that investments would perform better than they have.

Reducing pension benefits to pre-1999 levels for new employees would save the state $93 billion over 30 years in payments to the California Public Employees' Retirement System, Schwarzenegger's office projects.

But the state would not save much in the current budget year. Under the governor's borrowing idea, the state would seek $2 billion upfront from CalPERS, backed by 30 subsequent years' worth of savings, sources said. The governor floated the idea earlier this month.

Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear would not comment.

Republicans and Democrats remain locked in a stalemate over whether to use higher taxes or spending reductions to reduce the last portion of a $19 billion deficit. With the impasse in its eighth week, negotiators are considering alternatives to generate savings, such as borrowing or deferring payments.

CalPERS has assets of roughly $207 billion, and one-third of its 1.6 million members are state workers. California is scheduled to pay $2.1 billion in general fund dollars – and $3.8 billion total – to CalPERS in the 2010-11 fiscal year.

There would be significant hurdles to Schwarzenegger's borrowing idea. Democrats would have to agree to change pensions, and they have been reluctant to do so unless labor unions reach contract agreements with the governor.

The CalPERS board, which includes Controller John Chiang and Treasurer Bill Lockyer, both Democrats, would also have to sign off on any arrangement to help the state with its deficit. CalPERS spokesman Brad Pacheco said CalPERS has not reviewed the proposal, adding, "If we did, we would look at it with our fiduciary duty to members and employers in mind."

State leaders have relied on CalPERS funds to balance the budget before. In 1991, Gov. Pete Wilson and lawmakers took $1.9 billion from Cal-PERS to help balance a then-record $14.3 billion deficit. Courts upheld that action, but the maneuver prompted public employee unions to put an initiative on the ballot in 1992 that gave the CalPERS board greater control and made it more difficult for the state to divert CalPERS funds.

In 1997, the California Supreme Court ordered the state to return $1.36 billion to the CalPERS system after state leaders diverted CalPERS payments to balance the budget in 1992 and 1993.

Democratic leaders have urged the governor to negotiate pension changes with labor unions representing state workers. Six of the state's 21 bargaining units have reached accords with the governor on pension and pay reductions.

Asked about state worker pensions, Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez, D-Los Angeles, said Thursday, "I'm not sure that we'll agree on every element of the governor's demands, but I think that we'll see pension reform that in the end we can all agree to."

For the first time in weeks, Pérez and Steinberg met with Schwarzenegger over lunch in Sacramento to discuss the budget. But all four legislative leaders and the governor have not met as a "Big Five" since June 14, 16 days before the fiscal year began.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call Kevin Yamamura, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 326-5548.

Read more articles by Kevin Yamamura



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals