0 comments | Print

Dan Walters: California budget battle is a replay of 2009

Published: Friday, Mar. 11, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Apr. 10, 2012 - 9:16 pm

So what's different about the 2011 edition of the budget wrangle, vis-à-vis the spectacle of dysfunction the Capitol produced in years past? Not much, as it's turning out.

Jerry Brown returned to the governorship he left 28 years earlier with largely the same expectations that predecessor Arnold Schwarzenegger had seven years earlier.

Both believed that the unique qualities they brought to the office – Schwarzenegger with his celebrity and independence, Brown with his experience and age – could, or even would, overcome the Capitol's chronic inability to do the public's business.

Both believed that they could personally persuade legislators of both parties to move outside their ideological comfort zones into the middle ground of compromise to bridge the state's perennial gap between income and outgo.

But as Schwarzenegger quickly learned, and Brown is learning, the "structural deficit" in the state budget is really the product of a deep-seated structural deficiency in the political system that makes effective and timely policy decisions virtually impossible to achieve.

What's happening, or not happening, this year bears an uncanny resemblance to how the budget drama unfolded two years ago.

Then, as now, the governor had a deal with Democrats, hinging on new taxes, that needed a few Republican votes to enact and an election to ratify. Then, as now, a few Republicans were dickering with the governor on side issues as anti-tax forces threatened political retaliation on GOP legislators who broke ranks.

The deal was done in February 2009, but was then undone by voters three months later when they rejected the package of implementing measures. Among other things, the election short-circuited the new taxes, which is why Brown is now seeking Republican agreement to ask voters to reinstate them.

Thursday was Brown's self-proclaimed 60-day deadline for action. It passed with a whimper as both legislative houses met for less than 20 minutes – just long enough to guarantee continuation of members' tax-free living expense checks – and blew town for the weekend.

Brown is still working on a handful of Republicans to back his plan, but so far they're demanding more than he, other Democrats and their political constituencies – such as unions and environmentalists – are willing to give.

Brown wants an election on the taxes in June, but he is beginning to bump up against legal and practical deadlines to get there.

Brown, like Schwarzenegger in 2009, may still nail down enough votes to make it happen. But even if he does, voters would have the last word.

They'd be asked to pay about $1,000 per family each year for five years. And if anything, the public's attitudes about the economy and Capitol dysfunction are now even more negative than they were then.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Dan Walters, (916) 321-1195. Back columns, www.sacbee.com/walters

Read more articles by Dan Walters



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals