Jon Ortiz

More Information

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: Did Jerry Brown miss a chance with CCPOA deal?

Published: Thursday, Apr. 21, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 - 8:13 pm

Gov. Jerry Brown has axed cellphones, sold off state cars and canceled state swag orders.

Clearly, this is a governor who knows the value of symbolism. But did he miss an opportunity to score a few more points with the labor deal he closed last month with the state's correctional officers?

The contract – already controversial because it didn't hit savings targets that Brown agreed on with the Legislature – includes "fitness incentive pay." It's the kind of benefit that makes members of the public roll their eyes: an extra $780 to $1,560 a year for correctional officers who submit to a physical exam.

Then-Gov. Gray Davis first negotiated the payment as a substitute for what was called "bouncing for bucks," running and jumping tests to measure employee fitness.

CCPOA members with fewer than five years on the job received an extra $65 per month for passing the test. Their senior colleagues received $130 per month.

If correctional officers failed, they had 60 days to get in shape and try again.

Davis phased out the tests for CCPOA in 2002, replacing them with the annual medical exam. The pay stayed the same.

Bouncing for bucks was the norm in public safety for many years. Some union contracts still require it, including one now covering the state's game wardens and park rangers.

But many government agencies stopped the reviews because employees injured themselves either preparing for the tests or taking them. The California Highway Patrol, for example, used to test employees but stopped in the mid- 1990s for just those reasons. The state rolled the money into officers' base salary.

CCPOA could have sought to do the same, said Craig Brown, a negotiator and lobbyist for the union.

"Our people were winding up on workers' comp," and administering the tests to 30,000 prison officers all over the state was expensive, he said. "There was a mutual agreement between the union and management that this wasn't working."

So now the union deal requires the yearly checkup.

While that's not exactly a high bar to jump over for an extra $780 to $1,560 per year, "at least you get them to go to the doctor," Brown said. Maybe you even weed out a few unfit officers.

You can hear the questions: Has this type of incentive outlived its time? Shouldn't Brown have tried to end it?

That may have been difficult, since so many other law enforcement deals have offered similar benefits for years. Even former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, CCPOA's mortal enemy, didn't try to end the pay.

Brown would have been asking the union to take a cut on top of the unpaid leave, higher pension contributions and lower retirement benefits promised to new hires that it did accept.

But had he succeeded, Brown would have won a concession that, like cutting cellphones and state cars, the public could have easily understood.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals