Photos Loading
previous next
  • RENÉE C. BYER / rbyer@sacbee.com

    Kathy Carroll, a former lawyer for the state Commission on Teacher Credentialing, urged lawmakers to request the audit.

  • RENÉE C. BYER / rbyer@sacbee.com

    Kathy Carroll reviews the state audit and related material in her Land Park home. Carroll was fired after reporting problems at the state Commission on Teacher Credentialing, which she served as an attorney. She’s appealing her dismissal.

0 comments | Print

Agency fails to crack down on teacher misconduct, California audit says

Published: Friday, Apr. 22, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 1A
Last Modified: Sunday, May. 20, 2012 - 1:09 pm

California lawmakers are demanding change after a state audit of the commission charged with cracking down on teacher misconduct found numerous flaws that could pose risks to children.

Among the cases cited in the April audit:

• An educator was charged with exposing middle school students to pornography in a case the Commission on Teacher Credentialing became aware of in October 2008. The commission did not request documents from police for 17 months.

• A teacher was arrested on charges for offenses ranging from prostitution to petty theft in 2007 – eventually pleading guilty to misdemeanor prostitution – but was permitted to renew his credential in 2008. It was revoked two years later.

• A substitute teacher urinated in a classroom while students were present and was banned by a judge from teaching for one year or being in the presence of children without adult supervision. The commission did not revoke his credential until six months after the court case ended.

Saying he was "deeply concerned," Senate Present Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, announced this week that legislative staffers are researching possible solutions and that the Joint Legislative Audit Committee will meet on May 10 to consider "numerous areas in need of immediate improvement."

Steinberg said the audit "calls into serious question the commission's commitment and capacity to investigate and act in a manner timely enough to protect the safety and well-being of schoolchildren."

Auditors found flaws in nearly every aspect of the commission's regulatory process, including lapses in launching investigations, updating files, gathering facts, tracking cases and revoking credentials. They also found that in August 2009 there was a three-year backlog of 12,600 arrest or prosecution reports to be entered into commission records.

"It's one of the worst-run organizations we've seen in a long, long time – of any state agency that we've looked at," state Auditor Elaine Howle told The Bee.

Even if school districts remove teachers from classrooms until accusations of misconduct are resolved, failure by the commission to keep timely records could enable offenders to be hired by other districts or states.

Commission Executive Director Dale Janssen, in written comments to The Bee, said the commission is committed to improving and has made numerous changes, including addition of an electronic case-tracking system.

The backlog of entering "lower-level reports of arrest and prosecution" was brought to his attention in July 2009. Immediate steps were taken to eliminate it, Janssen said and that was accomplished in June 2010.

Janssen said that staff inefficiency is unacceptable but that some delays stemmed from lengthy police and court processes or lack of timely notification from school districts.

"The commission has never had a complaint or a report that a delay in processing has caused harm to a student," the commission wrote to Howle in responding to the audit.

Handling times could have been cut in some cases but did not exceed legal limits, the commission said. Statutes of limitation generally stretch for up to four years after an act of misconduct or one year after the agency should have known about it.

Howle said that meeting legal time limits is not good enough – taxpayers deserve quicker action – and that auditors are not convinced that the new computer case-tracking system has solved many problems.

Auditors examined misconduct cases from before and after the system was implemented and found problems in the accuracy and timeliness of actions taken in both, Howle said. "I don't agree that their case management system has fixed the problem," she said.

Howle criticized what she considered an overreliance on court convictions before revoking credentials, saying the commission has the right and responsibility to gather information about misconduct and act on its own.

Steinberg requested the audit at the urging of a whistle-blower, Kathy Carroll, a commission attorney who expressed concern about the office's timeliness and backlog. She was fired while the audit was under way last fall. Her appeal is pending.

Kevin Gordon, a veteran education lobbyist, said the audit tackled a vital issue, because school fiscal and accountability pressures make it more important than ever that dollars be spent wisely.

"The bad teacher in the classroom is rarer than a lot of people think, but if we don't have a meaningful way to address instances among the teacher force, then it makes the education community much more vulnerable to attacks that may be unfounded," he said.

The audit found that in 11 of 29 cases sampled randomly, the commission took more than 80 days to open a case after receiving a report of misconduct – with one case taking nearly two years and another taking almost three years.

Auditors questioned the commission's legal authority to permit staff to open or close cases of teacher misconduct without presenting them to a seven-member committee designed to make recommendations about revoking credentials or taking other punitive action.

The audit found 59 applicants who were granted credentials by staff, without committee review, after failing to disclose misconduct ranging from shoplifting to battery to drug-related offenses.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call Jim Sanders, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 326-5538.

Read more articles by Jim Sanders



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals