Dan Walters

0 comments | Print

Dan Walters: If California legislators get paid, vetoed budget is giant charade

Published: Friday, Jun. 17, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Monday, Apr. 16, 2012 - 11:41 pm

Now isn't this fun? The Legislature's Democrats push a chewing-gum-and-baling-wire budget through in near-record time, claiming that it's balanced and meets the rarely observed June 15 constitutional deadline for action.

One day later, Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown rejects it as unbalanced and unworkable – after hinting three days before that he might sign such a budget.

"It continues big deficits for years to come and adds billions of dollars in new debt," Brown said in Thursday's veto message, parroting what Republicans had said.

"It also contains legally questionable maneuvers, costly borrowing and unrealistic savings. It is not financeable and therefore would not allow us to meet our obligations as they occur," he added.

An hour later, the Legislature's two Democratic leaders replied in kind, defending their handiwork and criticizing Brown for clinging to a cut-and-tax budget plan that he hasn't been able to enact after nearly six months of trying.

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez repeatedly used the word "dismayed," and Steinberg mused that Brown is pursuing "some elaborate strategy to force a confrontation."

"We met our deadline," Steinberg told reporters. "The governor's deadline is July 1."

"We haven't seen any movement in six months," Pérez chimed in."

As the two were pushing the budget package, they repeatedly suggested that since Brown would have 12 days to sign or veto it, he'd have time to restart negotiations with Republicans on his version. It appeared they were miffed he acted so quickly rather than using their budget as leverage.

That presumes, of course, that the Democratic budget somehow put pressure on Republicans. In fact, it may have had the opposite effect of increasing their leverage on Brown to make concessions to get his centerpiece, an extension of expiring sales, income and car taxes, on the ballot.

A complicating factor is that Steinberg, Pérez and public employee unions really don't want the fall election that Brown seeks on taxes, fearing – with good reason – that voters would reject them.

Still another is the new state law that strips legislators of salaries and expense checks, about $400 per day each, if a budget is not passed by June 15.

Controller John Chiang has appointed himself the law's enforcer. Legislative leaders contend that Wednesday's budget action complies, but Brown's declaration that the budget was unbalanced gives Chiang grounds to stop the paychecks if he wishes.

Chiang was waffling Thursday, saying he wants "to complete our analysis" before deciding whether to pay lawmakers at the end of the month.

If Chiang pays legislators, the rejected budget will look like a giant charade by Democrats to evade the law.

And the fun will continue.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Dan Walters, (916) 321-1195. Back columns, www.sacbee.com/walters

Read more articles by Dan Walters



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals