Photos Loading
previous next
  • RANDALL BENTON / rbenton@sacbee.com

    Another key Battle Creek issue is the series of dams than have impeded salmon migration.

  • RANDALL BENTON / rbenton@sacbee.com

    Clear cutting of forests -- like this bare patch Marily Woodhouse walked through in the spring -- near Battle Creek is one of the key issues that affect salmon protection in that once-teeming stream in Shasta County.

Our Region - Environment
0 comments | Print

Groups ask Jerry Brown to protect Battle Creek watershed

Published: Friday, Jun. 24, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Friday, Jun. 24, 2011 - 10:51 am

Five environmental and fishing groups on Thursday urged Gov. Jerry Brown to protect a costly salmon restoration project from state-approved logging.

The Bee reported Sunday that the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, also known as Cal Fire, has approved thousands of acres of clear-cut logging in the Battle Creek watershed.

Just downstream, other state agencies are spending voter-approved bond funds to remove five dams. The aim is to return endangered salmon to 48 miles of creek that have been blocked for 90 years.

"It makes no sense to be both restoring and destroying a river all at the same time – and at taxpayer expense," said Glen Spain, regional director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associations, a commercial fishing group and longtime supporter of the dam removals.

Taxpayers are investing $128 million in the project, which focuses on a system of dams on Battle Creek owned by Pacific Gas & Electric Co. About halfway finished, it includes removing five small dams and building new fish ladders on four others.

Money for the project comes from federal grants and taxpayer-approved bonds overseen by the state's water and wildlife agencies.

The logging, under way mainly on land owned by Sierra Pacific Industries, complies with state law. But it occurs at a time when the state Department of Fish and Game no longer monitors affects on wildlife and aquatic habitat due to budget reductions and job cuts.

A disputed study by a consultant of the watershed concluded that erosion from logging has already compromised salmon spawning habitat in the creek.

Additional clear-cutting threatens to add more erosion to the system, which could smother spawning habitat vital to steelhead and winter- and spring-run chinook, the species targeted by the dam-removal project.

Cal Fire is overseen by the state Board of Forestry. The board has powers to adopt special protections in a unique watershed, but has never done so on its own initiative.

The critics urged Brown to make that happen. A spokesman for the governor did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Stan Dixon, chairman of the Board of Forestry.

Richard Stapler, spokesman for the state Natural Resources Agency, which oversees Cal Fire and the Board of Forestry, called California logging rules the nation's "most stringent" and said state officials "will continue to monitor" Battle Creek logging.

"The state takes environmental protection issues very seriously," Stapler said.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Matt Weiser, (916) 321-1264. Follow him on Twitter @matt_weiser.

Read more articles by Matt Weiser



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals