0 comments | Print

California school districts push to reverse new protections for teachers

Published: Monday, Jul. 4, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

A budget-related bill that Gov. Jerry Brown signed Thursday has sparked a division within the education community as school districts push to reverse new protections for teachers.

Lawmakers passed Assembly Bill 114 in the final 45 minutes of the legislative session Tuesday night. The bill protects teachers from further layoffs in the new fiscal year.

It also requires districts to ignore the possibility they could lose $1.5 billion in classroom funding in December as well as $248 million in school bus money.

Teachers say those protections ensure stability through the school year. District officials say those requirements restrict their ability to plan for a midyear reduction. They are also frustrated by the suspension of requirements that districts show how they balance their budgets for three years.

Two groups that represent school districts put their concerns in writing, sending letters last week to Brown.

School Services of California, which advises districts on fiscal matters, called the budget unstable and said that AB 114 "adds insult to injury by gutting these critical fiscal oversight provisions."

The California School Boards Association urged the governor to clean up the bill with subsequent legislation and suggested it may consider legal action against the state for possibly underfunding Proposition 98 through a sales tax shift to counties.

Many school officials believe that underlying AB 114 was the possibility that the California Teachers Association might have challenged the state if lawmakers had not protected teachers and offered to repay schools $2.1 billion in future years.

Assembly Republican leader Connie Conway of Tulare issued a letter Thursday that agreed with CSBA's complaints. She did not say whether she would propose legislation to roll back the bill, though any GOP attempt would likely fall flat since the two parties did not work together on the budget.

Not all school fiscal representatives were angry. Veteran schools lobbyist Kevin Gordon said, "If it was what was necessary to get us a budget without cuts in (funding) to schools this year, in the entire context of what we've been through, this is language we need to live with."

Democratic leaders who crafted the budget downplayed the concerns.

Brown said in his signing message that districts should "take all reasonable steps to balance their budgets and to maintain positive cash balances."

While AB 114 requires districts to assume they will get the same funding they did last fiscal year, he suggested they could still make cuts if short on funding for other reasons.

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, embraced the bill during a Senate floor session. "If the charge is that we went out of our way to avoid (having) more teachers lose their jobs and avoid class size increases, guilty as charged," he said.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Kevin Yamamura



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals