Photos Loading
previous next
  • Phillip Garrido, seen in a 1977 prisonmug shot, was under federal parole supervision in 1991 when he abducted 11-year-old Jaycee Lee Dugard.

  • In June, Garrido began serving a life sentence in a California prison in the Dugard case.

0 comments | Print

Editorial: Have parole agencies learned from Garrido?

Published: Saturday, Jul. 16, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 14A
Last Modified: Sunday, Jul. 17, 2011 - 11:49 am

After far too long, the shocking details of how federal probation officers completely failed to supervise Phillip Garrido are coming to light.

The hard-to-believe mistakes and horrendous judgment are as bad as, if not worse than, those of California parole agents. Those who were supposed to protect society from the likes of Garrido let him keep Jaycee Lee Dugard prisoner for 18 years.

By stonewalling, the U.S. Parole Commission tried to escape being held to account. It failed in that, too.

This month, James Ware, the chief U.S. District Court judge for Northern California, took it upon himself to make public a confidential report issued in December by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts that is unsparing in its criticism of federal parole officers and their supervisors. "I believe that the strength of our public institutions is tied directly to their openness to public scrutiny," wrote Ware, who deserves full credit for releasing the report.

Then Monday, Garrido's 351-page federal parole file was released through a Freedom of Information request filed by The Bee in September 2009.

Together, they itemize an inexcusable record of ineptitude and leniency – "clearly substandard," the report concludes – during the nearly 11 years that Garrido was under federal parole supervision, from December 1988 until his early discharge in March 1999.

During all that time, officers made less than a dozen home visits. One of those rare checks came in June 1991, only nine days after Garrido snatched 11-year-old Jaycee near her home in South Lake Tahoe.

Another came six months later, but Garrido cut it short, saying he had to take his wife to work. There was no follow-up. Indeed, it appears the next home visit didn't happen for more than three years, until May 1995, the report says. During that time, Garrido repeatedly assaulted Dugard, who gave birth to her first child at age 14.

Officers didn't talk to neighbors or local law enforcement, and at times misled state officials. They ignored frequent positive drug tests and didn't verify that Garrido had registered as a sex offender. They went months at a time with no contact whatsoever with Garrido.

The San Francisco-based office recommended his early release from parole. "You are commended for having responded positively to supervision and for the personal accomplishments you have made," the Parole Commission wrote Garrido. "The commission trusts that you will continue to be a productive citizen and obey the laws of society."

The report says there's no evidence that even if federal officers had searched Garrido's Antioch home, they would have found Dugard, who was being confined in a backyard shed, noting that state officers also failed to discover her.

"Nevertheless," the report says, "one may fairly question whether Garrido could have been deterred from the horrendous acts attributed to him had his federal supervision been conducted properly from the outset."

Even after a review in 2000 concluded that the probation office's supervision of offenders was poor, it followed none of the recommendations. Changes were made only after the district court replaced the chief probation officer in 2007, the report says.

The administrative office and Ware say there have been substantial improvements since, notably requiring more frequent home visits.

The Parole Commission says it's still evaluating the report and has no response.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has also tried to fix shortcomings made painfully clear during the decade its parole agents supervised Garrido, until his crimes against Dugard were discovered in August 2009.

Of 14 recommendations made by the state inspector general in a report that November, the department has satisfactorily implemented 10, according to a May 2011 follow-up audit. Since then, the department says it has made more progress on a key area by giving parole agents more training on how to supervise sex offenders.

Because of its grievous blunders, the state is paying a $20 million settlement to Dugard, whose memoir sold 175,000 copies on its first day of release this week.

There's no guarantee, but the changes hopefully will prevent another case like this from ever happening. Those lessons, however, came at a heavy price for Jaycee Dugard.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals