0 comments | Print

California Guard likely faces a battle to recover incentive funds

Published: Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011 - 9:31 pm | Page 11A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2011 - 6:04 pm

A year-long federal criminal investigation into recruiting and retention incentive payments to California Army National Guard members yielded its first results recently when retired Master Sgt. Toni Jaffe pleaded guilty to filing false claims of $15.2 million. She faces up to five years in prison and could be responsible for full restitution of those funds.

That total is far from a complete accounting, according to Guard records and auditor statements. Bonuses and student loan repayments for service members unqualified for the benefits, or who otherwise received them improperly, could have been as high as $100 million, according to a Guard auditor who blew the whistle.

A Bee investigation, published in October, sparked a nationwide audit by federal authorities, which is still pending. The National Guard Bureau, which is conducting the review, did not respond to questions about when it would be completed.

Jaffe managed the Army Guard's incentive programs and processed most of about 32,000 payments now under review.

The investigation continues, and other pleas or charges could emerge in coming weeks or months, according to Guard and law enforcement officials.

After the U.S. Department of Justice decides whether to charge other suspects, it will return records to the Guard, which will then make its own determinations about administrative penalties or military judicial action against any Guard members, said Adjutant General David S. Baldwin, who was appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown in April.

In the meantime, all pending bonus payments have been suspended until they can be verified as correct.

A new team of investigators – led by Col. David Shaw, who Baldwin said has civilian prosecutorial experience – will handle eventual recoupment. Shaw's group includes Sgts. Ray Douke and Cody Lathrop – incentive managers who replaced Jaffe – whom Baldwin praised for detecting the fraud.

The case of Maj. Jeffrey Nichols, a planning officer in the Guard's Sacramento headquarters, reflects the flavor of disputes that the group will face.

Guard documents showed that Nichols received $45,000 in student loan repayments in 2008 in violation of laws and military policies, as The Bee reported last year.

He was among the highest-ranking officers to get funds improperly and one with an extraordinary relationship to the recruiting process: Shortly after he got his benefits, he temporarily directed Guard incentives nationwide in a program operated by the National Guard Bureau, which provides federal funding and policy guidance.

Nichols recently complained, in an email to The Bee, that his career had been harmed unfairly by the scandal. "I was contacted, notified, and told I was qualified" for the loan repayments by Guard officials, he said, "and put faith in the process."

"I had no knowledge, understanding, or involvement whatsoever in this nightmare," Nichols added.

Baldwin described a three-step process adjudicating such claims.

If simple paperwork errors were made by service members who otherwise would have qualified for benefits, the Guard will assist them in filing correct documents.

Soldiers who received funds improperly – whether from confusion or having been misled by recruiters – would likely be forced to repay the government, although final decisions would be up to federal authorities. In such cases, they would be offered payment plans and other assistance to reduce personal hardship.

Soldiers who knowingly took money improperly or leaders who "didn't take any money but set policies in motion or created a command climate conducive to opportunistic behavior" could be penalized severely.

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Guard can try its members for "dereliction of duty or conduct unbecoming" as well as other possible crimes related to incentive fraud.

If warranted after appropriate due process, Baldwin added: "I have the authority to put people in jail."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Charles Piller



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals