Jon Ortiz

More Information

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: Labor-unfriendly measures aim for 2012 ballot

Published: Thursday, Sep. 8, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Wednesday, May. 2, 2012 - 10:44 pm

A few snippets of state worker news worth watching:

• Three ballot measures drawing fire from public labor unions can begin collecting signatures, aiming to make a 2012 ballot.

The initiatives would end public employee collective bargaining, tax six-figure CalPERS and CalSTRS pensions up to 25 percent and raise the minimum retirement age for members of those retirement systems to 65 (or 58 for sworn public safety officers).

Labor teed off after the secretary of state's Wednesday announcement the measures could circulate.

"These extremist attempts at undermining retirement security for millions of Californians are dead on arrival," said Steve Maviglio of Californians for Retirement, which represents 1.5 million public employees.

The initiatives' author, UC Santa Barbara economics lecturer Lanny Ebenstein, must collect 807,615 valid voter signatures for each measure to get them on a 2012 ballot.

Ebenstein couldn't be reached Wednesday, but last month he told The State Worker that unnamed backers had committed a few hundred thousand dollars to a signature drive and that in all he'll need $1.5 million with a lot of volunteer help.

Then there's the millions more in campaign cash he'll need for the union ad war.

• State government's flexibility – and when's the last time you saw those three words together? – gets a test that starts Friday.

Unless lawmakers mount some opposition, efforts launch tomorrow to reorganize two state personnel departments into a single human resources unit.

Brown wants to fuse the State Personnel Board and the Department of Personnel Administration to trim a decades-in-the-making bureaucratic thicket that bogs down things like employee hiring and discipline.

The system is so confusing that the state has a Web page titled, "Who does what – State Personnel Board and DPA." Print it out and you'll get a nine-page list with about 300 entries.

Today is the deadline for a Senate or Assembly resolution to block Brown's plan. Despite some union concerns, no one is against the concept. Look for the new California Department of Human Resources to launch July 1, 2012.

• Brown vetoed a bill that would have increased Cal-PERS payments to surviving spouses and dependents of local government workers.

The measure focused on 13,000 beneficiaries locked into plans that pay the least and have never been adjusted. A 79-year-old widow currently receiving a $180 monthly check since 1994, for example, would have seen the payment increase to $350.

CalPERS sponsored the bill, saying that it has more than enough money in the survivors' fund to cover the increases.

Politics, not payments, prompted Brown's thumbs down. His veto message hints at a larger agenda: "(T)he changes this bill makes should be part of a more comprehensive pension reform."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Jon Ortiz, (916) 321-1043. Read his blog, The State Worker, at sacbee.com/blogs.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments

Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals