PAUL KITAGAKI JR. / pkitagaki@sacbee.com

Mayor Kevin Johnson, left, chats with state Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, center, and Sen. Ted Gaines, the co-chairmen of Think Big Sacramento, before presenting the group's outline of financing ideas for a downtown arena.

0 comments | Print

City officials to dissect arena funding options

Published: Wednesday, Sep. 14, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Sunday, Jan. 8, 2012 - 10:02 am

The ball is back in City Hall's hands.

Now that Mayor Kevin Johnson's arena task force has reported that funding a new facility in the downtown railyard is possible, city officials will embark on their own vetting of the $387 million project.

They'll need help. City Manager John Shirey recommended to the City Council on Tuesday that a team of outside attorneys, investment bankers and consultants be assembled "to put together the due diligence I think we need to do."

It's unclear how much those consultants will cost and how the city will pay for them.

Officials will be working under a tight timeline as they explore which public and private funding options offered by the arena task force make sense.

Those options include revenue from the leasing of city-owned parking facilities, a federal program that allows foreign investors to invest in projects here in exchange for green cards, and various "user fees" aimed at those who would visit the arena.

Dan Barrett, a stadium financing consultant working for the city, told the council that if it is going to explore the parking lease option, "you need to be moving forward aggressively." Such deals can take up to a year to put together, Barrett said.

The city wants to have the framework for the project's financing plan – a plan that will rely upon an agreement by the Sacramento Kings – by the end of the year. If no concrete plan is in place by March, the Kings have said they intend to leave town.

Council members expressed optimism with the progress made so far.

"We've done this before, but frankly, we've never gotten this far," said Councilman Rob Fong, who will be part of a city team of negotiators who will work with the Kings and NBA over the following months. "I'm very optimistic."

One of the first steps in the development process will be to work with those who will spearhead the project. To that end, the City Council directed staff members to negotiate with downtown developer David Taylor and arena builder ICON Venue Group on a deal to build the facility. That agreement will come back for final council approval in three weeks.

Taylor and ICON designed the arena proposal. Taylor is well-known in Sacramento, having built several downtown high-rises and the new City Hall building.

Based in Denver, ICON Venue is one of the elite players in the world of stadium and arena development. ICON's business connections could be crucial to the arena effort. The firm is partly owned by AEG, the Los Angeles arena operator that could become another key partner in the Sacramento arena saga.

The mayor's Think Big Sacramento task force could look to AEG for millions in capital to get the project rolling, similar to the $50 million AEG invested in Kansas City's 4-year-old arena. ICON developed that arena – and many others – in partnership with AEG.

Meanwhile, a city analysis of the arena proposal raised a series of logistical hurdles and potential extra costs – barriers that city officials said they were confident could be crossed.

Among the issues raised in the report:

• While some toxic cleanup has been done at the proposed arena site, "additional remediation work will possibly be required to use the area for an arena."

• The arena may require costly changes in plans for new water, sewer and drainage systems on the site.

• In order to fit an arena and a new transit center in the lower portion of the railyard, the city will have to acquire an adjacent 2-acre site. Representatives of the owner, Inland American, say they're willing to do a deal with the city, but have not discussed price.

• Although there are thousands of existing parking spots within walking distance of the arena site, the project likely will require 1,500 to 1,800 new "premium" parking spots close to the arena. The arena development team could negotiate with the state to share 900 spots in the juror lot at a planned new Superior Court building in the railyard.

• Although many millions of dollars are already earmarked for road expansions in the railyard area, an arena likely will require even more roadwork.

• A site has yet to be chosen for a basketball team practice facility.

Fong said the presence of a sports arena in the railyard could speed the development of the 240-acre site "because it's bringing private investment where there was none before."

"Everything so far has not been a roadblock," Fong said. "We're still going forward."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Ryan Lillis, (916) 321-1085. Read his City Beat blog at sacbee.com/citybeat.



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals