Rep. John Garamendi, D-Walnut Grove, sits on the House Armed Services Committee.

0 comments | Print

Viewpoints: After 10 years, U.S. needs exit strategy from Afghanistan

Published: Thursday, Oct. 6, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 13A
Last Modified: Sunday, Oct. 9, 2011 - 3:56 pm

On Oct. 7, 2001, the United States officially began Operation Enduring Freedom and the war in Afghanistan. The last decade of war has cost thousands of U.S. lives and hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars.

As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, and as a representative of thousands of service members, military families and veterans, I am entrusted with weighing in on decisions that have a profound impact on the security of our nation, and on the men and women who risk their lives every day to ensure that security.

As we mark the 10th anniversary of the longest war in America's history, we believe it is time for Congress to ask some serious questions about our military engagement in Afghanistan.

Who are we fighting in Afghanistan?

We entered this war because of the threat posed by the international terrorist organization al-Qaida. While al-Qaida expands its operations around the globe, our military is tied up in a ground war against the Taliban, an Afghan rebel group with domestic ambitions.

Senior intelligence officials have estimated that fewer than 100 al-Qaida members remain in Afghanistan, yet we plan to keep 68,000 U.S. troops there through next year.

If we are to defeat terrorism, we must stick to our original strategic mission, maintaining a laser-like focus on al-Qaida, and capitalizing on our technological and intelligence advantage to cut off their financing, intersect their operations, and take out their leaders. The successful operation against Osama bin Laden epitomizes this targeted approach.

Where is our money going?

Afghanistan is widely considered one of the most corrupt countries in the world, behind only Somalia, and new reports of corruption emerge every day. Billions of U.S. dollars have been siphoned off by crooked officials and contractors, carried out of the Kabul airport in bags of cash, and even funneled to warlords and Taliban members who run a lucrative protection racket.

To date, the United States has spent nearly half a trillion dollars in Afghanistan, and that price tag increases by $10 billion every month we stay. Meanwhile, we are forced to cut critical services at home in the face of a rising deficit and financial instability. Continuing to hemorrhage finite U.S. resources in Afghanistan makes us less safe, not more.

When will this war end?

While the current timeline commits 68,000 troops through 2013, recent media reports have suggested that in ongoing talks with the Afghan government on the future of the U.S.-Afghanistan relationship, the United States has considered maintaining more than 35,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan until 2025, at an expected cost of nearly $50 billion per year.

The burden of this war is largely borne by a relatively small number of dedicated service members and their families, including thousands of people I represent in Congress. Many of our troops on the ground in Afghanistan are on their third or fourth tour. These heroes have served with valor and distinction, and they deserve the ability to return home to their families.

The human costs of this war are immeasurable when we consider the circles of grief that surround each of the more than 10,000 Americans who have been killed or wounded. Our forces are overstretched, and our bank account is overdrawn; we need a definitive end date for our nation's longest war.

The dedication and commitment of America's men and women in uniform are absolute. Our troops in Afghanistan execute orders that put them at risk because they trust that the mission in which they are deployed is absolutely critical to our nation's national security. This steadfast loyalty is our nation's most sacred resource, and thus it is our most solemn responsibility to ensure it is never squandered.

There is no U.S. military solution in Afghanistan; a political reconciliation process that engages the various factions is the only prospect for a stable country. Afghanistan's future depends on Afghans, not American soldiers. By ending this war, America can focus on rebuilding the foundations of America's strength and security by paying down our federal deficit, growing our economy and putting Americans back to work.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Rep. John Garamendi, D-Walnut Grove, sits on the House Armed Services Committee.

Read more articles by John Garamendi



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals