0 comments | Print

Sacramento suspends permit process for medical pot stores

Published: Thursday, Oct. 20, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 1A
Last Modified: Sunday, Jan. 8, 2012 - 10:02 am

The city of Sacramento, unnerved by a federal crackdown on marijuana dispensaries, has abruptly suspended its process for issuing permits to medical pot stores.

The city's order of a "temporary freeze" on dispensary applications comes as other jurisdictions around the state are also reviewing their approach to medical marijuana outlets in light of recent federal actions.

Sacramento's move doesn't mean that the 38 medical marijuana stores operating in the city will have to close. But halting the application process could put in limbo their long-term prospects. Closing the dispensaries would cut off an annual infusion of $1 million the city had counted on in voter-approved taxes on the receipts of marijuana stores.

In an Oct. 18 memo obtained by The Bee, City Manager John Shirey cited the specter of federal action against dispensaries as a reason for suspending the permitting process. Shirey also noted a recent state appellate court ruling that found a Long Beach ordinance regulating dispensaries runs afoul of federal law, which regards marijuana as an illegal drug, medical or otherwise.

"As a result of the uncertain climate on medical marijuana, I have directed staff to freeze or halt the processing of applications for medical marijuana," Shirey said in the memo to the City Council. "As of this time, we will not accept any new applications or set future hearing dates until we receive further direction … on the legal viability of the city's medical marijuana ordinance."

Declaring that the state's medical marijuana law "has been hijacked by profiteers," California's four U.S. prosecutors last week announced investigations and prosecutions of dispensaries, growers and investors throughout the state's medical marijuana market.

Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent Casey McEnry said U.S. agents served search warrants Monday on the MediZen Collective dispensary on Northgate Boulevard in Sacramento but made no arrests.

Federal authorities recently indicted six men connected with the R & R Wellness Collective in south Sacramento and seized the bank accounts of another city marijuana store, the One Love Wellness Center, in North Sacramento.

Last year, the City Council voted to allow as many as 38 registered marijuana shops to apply for special permits to stay in business. The city has since collected nearly $1.2 million in dispensary licensing and permit fees.

So far, Sacramento has also taken in $280,000 from a 4 percent medical marijuana tax, which went into effect July 1 and was expected to generate $1 million a year.

Max Fernandez, director of the city Community Development Department, said all permit hearings on dispensaries are now on hold, but that the city will consider extending a Jan. 9, 2012, deadline for dispensaries to either be permitted or go out of business.

"Nobody is going south or north on this," said Fernandez. "What we're doing is waiting until the dust settles between the feds and the state. If we're able to continue, nobody is going to lose any ground."

The city will continue collecting taxes from the dispensaries as long as they remain open.

To date, 33 dispensaries are in various stages of the city permit process. So far, four have been issued operating permits. They are the midtown All About Wellness dispensary, the Fruitridge Health and Wellness Collective in south Sacramento, the El Camino Wellness Center off El Camino Avenue and Unity Non-Profit Collective on Tribute Road near the Capital City Freeway.

One of the city's best known establishments, Canna Care off Interstate 80 and Norwood Avenue, was due for a hearing on its permit application next month. Now that is off.

Canna Care co-operator Lanette Davies said she had just taken money from her 401(k) account to pay more than $40,000 in permit fees.

"And now they've frozen it," Davies said of the process. "That damned U.S. attorney. He just scares the heck out of these people."

Besides uncertainty over federal actions, including threats to seize properties of landlords who lease to dispensaries or medical marijuana cultivators, cities are concerned about an Oct. 4 ruling by the state's 2nd District Court of Appeal.

The court ruled that Long Beach's dispensary plan – with permitting rules similar to Sacramento's – was an "obstacle" to federal drug law. The ruling departed from an earlier decision, by the state's 4th District Court of Appeal, that the city of Anaheim couldn't simply use federal law as grounds for banning dispensaries.

"Given the possible implications … many city attorneys are now examining their ordinances" for marijuana dispensaries, said Eva Spiegel, a spokeswoman for the California League of Cities.

George Mull, a Sacramento medical marijuana lawyer, said federal authorities are likely targeting "bad actors" already violating state laws. But he said uncertainty is causing some dispensaries, including two recently in Sacramento County, to close.

"Dispensaries are making calculated decisions right now," Mull said, "to see if it's worth the risk to stay open to fight the fight."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Peter Hecht, (916) 326-5539.

Read more articles by Peter Hecht



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals