Jon Ortiz

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: Do local pension measures predict statewide outcome?

Published: Thursday, Nov. 10, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Wednesday, May. 2, 2012 - 10:44 pm

Politics is a lot like the stock market: Past performance doesn't guarantee future returns.

With that caveat, let's look at how the public voted Tuesday and ask: What does this mean for the public pension debate in 2012?

San Francisco: Mayor Ed Lee's pension plan whupped Public Defender Jeff Adachi's tougher measure.

Some 68 percent of voters backed Lee's plan, written with union input and promoted with labor's money. It requires city workers to contribute 7.5 percent of pay to their pensions, with future hikes or discounts tied to the pension fund's health.

Adachi's plan set a 7.5 percent minimum contribution, rising to 16 percent for the highest-paid employees during dire fiscal times.

Adachi also ran against Lee for the city's top job and lost by a wide margin.

Reformers' spin: "I don't think you can draw parallels" to upcoming pension overhaul attempts, said California Pension Reform spokesman Aaron McLear. His group wants to put a pension measure on next November's ballot.

That's a political lifetime. A lot can change, McLear said: "Hillary Clinton was leading the presidential polls four year ago."

Labor's spin: "If you put something modest on the ballot it will prevail over a radical measure," said Steve Maviglio, spokesman for union coalition Californians for Retirement Security.

Modesto: Three advisory measures asked voters whether city officials should replace guaranteed pensions with 401(k)-style plans (Measure Q), change pension calculations to curb "spiking" (Measure R) and whether the city should raise the qualifying retirement age (Measure S).

As of Wednesday, all three measures were passing with 58 percent of the vote or more.

Reformers' spin: "Polls show that the public wants pension reform," McLear said. "We don't think that's going to change."

Labor's spin: A cautionary tale. The author of Q, R and S, City Councilman Brad Hawn, placed second in his bid for mayor. Pension reform, Maviglio asserted, is not an issue on which to build a political career.

Ohio: Sixty-one percent of voters reversed a sweeping law limiting public employee collective bargaining, among other things.

Reformers' spin: An overreach killed by $30 million that labor raised to defeat it. "We need to do some of this reform," No. 2 ranking Senate Republican Keith Faber told the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

Underscore "some."

Labor's spin: Ohio Civil Service Employees Association President Christopher Mabe said, Ohioans "believe that government runs best when front-line workers have a seat at the table."

It's striking that labor now considers holding its ground or accepting lesser concessions a "win." With three pension proposals vying for next year's statewide ballot, including one backed by Gov. Jerry Brown, we'll soon know if this is a momentary swing or a deep-seated, enduring shift.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Jon Ortiz, (916) 321-1043. Read his blog, The State Worker, at sacbee.com/blogs.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals