Andrew Cooper

Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart return in "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1."

0 comments | Print

Movie review: 'Dawn' gives saga new look

Published: Friday, Nov. 18, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 16TICKET

Let's get the bad stuff out of the way first: Taylor Lautner remains an unreliable, wildly uneven actor. His line readings range from fine to passable to stilted and awkward, sometimes all within the same scene, and you can't imagine him having much of a career once this franchise runs its course.

The wolf pack – the five young men of Quilette descent who also happen to be lycanthropes – are played by actors chosen for their six-pack abs, not their talents. Whenever one of them opens his mouth, you are instantly catapulted right out of the movie.

And the computer-generated werewolves still look cheap and cartoonish – never more so than in a scene in which they stand around talking (or at least communicating telepathically.) Unintentional laughter is practically guaranteed.

But despite all that, "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1" does something that no previous "Twilight" movie achieved: This one draws you close and keeps you there – and, for those of us who haven't read Stephenie Meyer's novel, delivers some surprising, even shocking turns.

As the movie opens, the long and tortured courtship between the teenage Bella (Kristen Stewart) and her vampire boyfriend Edward (Robert Pattinson) has reached an end, and they are finally preparing to marry. Director Bill Condon ("Dreamgirls," "Kinsey") and screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg don't waste any time building up to the ceremony. The film hurtles towards Bella and Edward's big day with a sense of purpose and drive, giving us hints along the way (such as Bella's nightmares) that this couple may not necessarily live happily ever after.

"What's a wedding without some family drama?" Edward ponders after a brief blow-up at the reception suggests that vampires and humans may not necessarily make the best in-laws. Then comes the honeymoon, which proves that vampires and humans may not make ideal couples, either. Working with cinematographer Guillermo Navarro (who shot "Pan's Labyrinth" and "Jackie Brown"), Condon gives "Breaking Dawn" a visual elegance and style the other films lacked.

Right from the start, the movie feels different – more mature and confident and substantial – which is critical, because the story is about to take some loopy, surprising twists, pushing into territory far more bizarre than any of the previous films suggested.

One of the most common complaints leveled at the "Twilight" movies is that nothing ever happens: After the first film, in which Bella and Edward met and fell in love, subsequent chapters consisted primarily of pining and longing and pointless romantic triangles (all that hand-wringing over Jacob, for example). But no matter what you make of "Breaking Dawn – Part 1" – and if you adamantly hate all things "Twilight," this film is not going to change your mind – I can't imagine anyone complaining that the movie was too slow.

Condon knows that the chemistry between Stewart and Pattinson has been the key to the popularity of this series, and he focuses on their connection as much as he can throughout the film. A long sequence in which the newlyweds honeymoon off the coast of Brazil and start having sex is easily the best, most engrossing stretch of any "Twilight" movie to date. While always observant of that PG-13 rating, "Breaking Dawn – Part 1" is still surprisingly frank and direct in depicting Bella's nervousness about losing her virginity (something Stewart conveys in a terrific silent montage) and, later, her cravings for a third and fourth and fifth helping (where the male is usually the aggressor in the sexual arena, the movie cleverly reverts the tables, making Edward the sought-after object of lust.) The trailers for "Breaking Dawn – Part 1" have already revealed that Bella winds up pregnant – and that her baby starts to grow inside her at an alarming speed. The birth of Bella and Edward's demon-child will have far-reaching consequences, most of which won't be settled until "Part 2" arrives next year. I have no idea where the story goes from here (although there's a scene that comes halfway through the end credits that gives you a good idea). But the biggest compliment you can pay "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1" is that the entire series could have ended with this movie, and I would have been satisfied – silly werewolves and all.

Imagine, then, how diehard "Twilight" fans will respond. Let the feeding frenzy begin.THE TWILIGHT

SAGA: BREAKING DAWN – PART 1

2 1/2 stars

Cast: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Peter Facinelli, Elizabeth Reaser, Nikki Reed, Billy Burke, Sarah Clarke, Kellan Lutz, Anna Kendrick

Director: Bill Condon

117 minutes

Rated PG-13 (Sexual situations, violence, a bloody birth, adult themes)

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals