0 comments | Print

Another View: Dems made choice not to fully fund vets homes

Published: Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 2E
Last Modified: Monday, Feb. 20, 2012 - 2:41 pm

Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, is responding to the Nov. 13 Forum story, "Vets homes in budget crossfire," which said, "Democrats blame Republicans for steadfastly opposing any tax hikes to avoid painful cuts in state programs like veterans homes."

As we saluted our veterans this past Veterans Day weekend, I was disturbed to read that Sacramento Democrats were claiming that Republicans were endangering our veterans because of our refusal to raise taxes.

As vice chairman of the Assembly Budget Committee, I have made it clear during this year's budget debate that our veterans should not be made victims of California's fiscal irresponsibility. That is why Republicans fought hard during budget negotiations to provide essential funding for the timely completion of new veterans homes in Fresno and Redding.

However for reasons that I can only surmise to be political, the Democrat-controlled Legislature cut the money for the new homes without advance warning in the budget that Gov. Jerry Brown signed June 30. No public hearings were held on this budget cut.

The article does point out we fought to transfer $8.1 million in unused prison construction money to open the homes in 2012. This would have restored funding without raising taxes or fees on Californians. Unfortunately, when given this funding alternative, the Democrats said no.

Given that my friend, Assemblyman Jeff Gorell, R-Camarillo, is currently serving in Afghanistan in the fight against terrorism, it is outrageous for Democrats to suggest we would throw current and future veterans under the bus because of our position on taxes.

After all, a budget is a document of choices. The Legislature could have found savings in other areas of government to fully fund our veterans homes, such as tackling the state's pension crisis much earlier or putting the brakes on the high-speed rail boondoggle that is now estimated to cost nearly $100 billion.

Funding for our veterans should never be a matter of debate, nor should our veterans be used as pawns in the majority party's budget manipulations. It is crass political grandstanding when Democrats use the legitimate needs of our veterans to justify their never-ending quest to raise taxes while refusing to find savings in other areas to make those veterans a priority.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, is responding to the Nov. 13 Forum story, "Vets homes in budget crossfire," which said, "Democrats blame Republicans for steadfastly opposing any tax hikes to avoid painful cuts in state programs like veterans homes."

Read more articles by Jim Nielsen



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals