0 comments | Print

CHW, Sutter pay $2.3 million to settle Medicare double-billing case

Published: Thursday, Dec. 8, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 6B

Two of Sacramento's biggest health care players paid a combined $2.3 million to the federal government to settle allegations that 61 of their hospitals double-billed Medicare for therapies and services, U.S. Department of Justice officials announced Wednesday.

Catholic Healthcare West paid more than $875,000 and Sutter Health nearly twice that – more than $1.43 million – for alleged duplicate charges for infusion therapies and treatments to break up kidney and bladder stones, in what Lauren Horwood, a spokeswoman in the Sacramento U.S. attorney's office, called "a significant settlement."

"This office will actively pursue recovery of Medicare dollars," U.S. Attorney Benjamin Wagner said in a statement Wednesday announcing the pact.

The settlement stemmed from a year-long investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services that began with department auditors, Horwood said.

The probe centered on CHW activities from January 2002 to March 2008 and Sutter Health activities from September 2003 to December 2007.

"This settlement not only recoups overpayments made by Medicare, it helps ensure more accurate billing practices by these hospital systems in the future," Wagner said.

Officials at the two health networks admitted no wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement, Horwood said. No charges will be filed. In a statement, CHW officials said the government in 2009 notified the health network of the overpayments. CHW auditors identified the charges – $875,564 in all – and returned the money to Medicare.

"CHW is committed to ethical business practices and is pleased to have resolved this matter," the statement read.

Sutter officials were not available for comment Wednesday.

The list of Sacramento-area facilities accused of overcharging include Mercy General Hospital, Mercy San Juan and Mercy's Methodist hospitals; Sutter General Hospital and Sutter campuses in Auburn, Davis, Grass Valley, Jackson and Roseville.

It's not the first time Sacramento-based Sutter has been accused of double-billing.

In April, state Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones joined a 2009 lawsuit alleging that Sutter Health routinely charged insurers for anesthesia services that were never performed and double-billed for services that were.

Jones, at the time, estimated that the charges were "in the hundreds of millions of dollars," in the suit filed in Sacramento Superior Court. That case is making its way through the courts, said Department of Insurance spokesman Ioannis Kazanis.

Sutter Health officials at the time denied the allegations, saying that the health network "is committed to compliant billing and charging practices."

Many of the Sutter hospitals named in the Department of Justice settlement announced Wednesday, including Sutter General and Sutter campuses in Auburn and Davis, were also named in the insurance commissioner's suit.

In 2006, Sutter Health agreed to grant discounts and refunds to uninsured patients the network was accused of overcharging, stemming from a 2004 class-action lawsuit.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Darrell Smith



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals