0 comments | Print

Company providing prescription drugs to CalPERS member settles big lawsuit

Published: Saturday, Dec. 17, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 6B
Last Modified: Friday, Mar. 23, 2012 - 4:41 pm

The company hired to deliver prescription drugs to CalPERS members is paying $19.9 million to settle claims that it cheated the California pension fund and other customers on a previous contract.

CVS Caremark was hired in June to run a massive drug-benefit contract covering 350,000 members of CalPERS' PPO plan.

CalPERS board members knew Caremark was facing a lawsuit claiming the company had defrauded the fund the last time it had the PPO drug contract, from 2003 to 2006. But the board went ahead with the new pact, saying the pension fund had instituted safeguards to prevent new problems.

The new Caremark contract with the California Public Employees' Retirement System, worth tens of millions of dollars a year, takes effect in January.

In the lawsuit, a group of former Caremark employees accused the company of falsifying records, improperly switching CalPERS members to cheaper drugs and illegally supplying members with drugs that had been returned to the Caremark warehouse.

On Friday, the employees' attorneys announced Caremark was settling the California suit, plus two similar cases in Illinois and Florida, for a combined $19.9 million.

Michael Leonard, an attorney in Chicago for the workers, said $6.9 million goes to settle the California case. Under California's whistle-blower law, the money will be shared between the workers and the state itself, he said.

Leonard called the settlement "a successful resolution" to a series of cases that began in 2003, while Caremark was still working on the first contract for CalPERS.

CalPERS spokesman Bill Madison said the fund is "pleased that the suit's been resolved" but declined further comment.

Caremark said it settled the case "to avoid the costs of continued litigation.

"There were no findings of wrongdoing or any admission of liability in any of the cases," the company said.

Caremark, based in Rhode Island, is a drug wholesaler and retailer whose operations include the CVS and Longs drugstore chains.

Ironically, Caremark was hired only because the top choice for the contract, Medco Health Solutions Inc. of New Jersey, was implicated in a bribery scandal that engulfed CalPERS over the past two years.

Medco has run the drug-benefit program since 2006 and won the bidding for a new contract last fall.

But in March, CalPERS cut off negotiations amid disclosures that Medco paid businessman and former CalPERS board member Alfred Villalobos some $4 million to represent the company in its dealings with the pension fund.

State officials have sued Villalobos, accusing him of bribing CalPERS officials to win investment deals for his Wall Street clients. He has denied any wrongdoing.

The state's lawsuit has nothing to do with Villalobos' work for Medco. But Medco, while saying it did nothing wrong, has acknowledged that it's being investigated by the California attorney general and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

With Medco out of the picture, CalPERS turned to the runner-up in the bidding, Caremark.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Dale Kasler, (916) 321-1066. Follow him on Twitter @dakasler.

Read more articles by Dale Kasler



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals