0 comments | Print

Editorial: State deserves a 21st-century voting system

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 10A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012 - 12:19 am

A dozen years have passed since the Bush-Gore presidential election debacle in Florida. A decade has passed since Congress approved the Help America Vote Act in response to the Florida events. The law required states to modernize their voter registration and vote tabulation systems.

California has received $380 million from the federal government to get the job done and another $200 million in bond money from state taxpayers.

But the fixes remain incomplete. Voting equipment has been updated. None of the punch card, chad-producing voting machines that caused such consternation in Florida remain in use in California.

However, a statewide voter registration database that would allow counties to easily and speedily clear deadwood from voting rosters, and to update registrations when voters move, remains undone. California is the only state in the union that has failed to put a final voter database in place.

County registrars say they've been told the new system, dubbed VoteCal, won't be ready before 2015 or 2016. That means not before the state goes through another presidential and gubernatorial election cycle, at minimum.

Justifiably frustrated by the lack of progress and by what many complain is a lack of leadership from Secretary of State Debra Bowen, county registrars sponsored Senate Bill 397 this year to authorize an interim online registration system. The system would allow voters to register or update their existing registrations on-line using signatures already on file with the California Department of Motor Vehicles. The DMV would transfer the signatures to the secretary of state, who would in turn deliver them to the counties, who could enter the information electronically.

Online registration would allow counties to avoid the inevitable paper crush when hundreds of thousands of citizens attempt to register just days or weeks before a presidential primary or general election. Registrars pushed hard to get the new online system in place by Jan. 1, only to run into opposition from Bowen. She initially claimed her office lacked the time and funding to implement it.

After the bill was amended to allow her to use federal funds, she did urge the governor to sign it. But it's still unclear that the online system will be up and running in time for the June primary. Bowen should make that a priority.

She campaigned as a tech-savvy innovator but has failed to significantly update or improve the state's clunky elections system. She blames the state's size and complexity and a cumbersome state government procurement process that requires her office to get clearance from both the Department of General Services and the California Office of Technology before it can take action.

She's right about the obstacles. Nonetheless, after five years in office and tens of millions in state and federal funds expended, the public is weary of excuses. Californians want and deserve a modern election system, one that allows them to do at least what voters in Oregon, Washington and Arizona can do – register online.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals