Mark Drolette

0 comments | Print

On the Lighter Side: Under the mattress is lookin' better all the time

Published: Sunday, Jan. 29, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3E

I can't believe I did it, but I did. (No, I didn't marry again. Sure, I'm dumb, but not that dumb.)

But I bought the snake oil; drank the Fool-Aid; got, er, pulled the finger. That's right: I opened a 401(k) a few months back, socking away $250 every payday since. To date, I've contributed $1,250 toward my moldin' years. My balance? An eye-popping $1,249.25. Meaning, then, I've made a negative 75 cents.

I'm pretty sure captive pandas produce better than that.

Then again, with such returns, I can retire in – let's see, carry the one, subtract everything – yep: seven years post-mortem. The good news is I now know the formula: I sock, they sack.

Who's "they," you say? Oh, the usual suspects, the ones who keep insisting 401(k)s are the only path to a rosy retirement (theirs): stockbrokers, hedge fund managers, congressional water carriers. The rest of us? Well, it's probably time to start demanding tastier cat food.

But, wait. Aren't these the same greedmeisters who tanked the economy in 2008, the same still-at-large felon-oughttabe's who ripped off most of the then-existing 401(k)s into which everyday Americans had been squirreling away hard-earned cash for decades? Are they really telling us to do it again?

You bet. (Literally.) But, this time, it'll be different. Lout's honor! (If you believe that, I've got some bundled derivatives I'd like to show you.)

Before continuing, a disclosure: I'm a state worker, Public Enemy No. 1 since bin Laden's been deadened. Thus, I'm one of the few Americans left with a guaranteed pension. For those screaming for my head, please! Speak to someone who (dis)honestly had something to do with spiking myriad American dreams. Like Bernie Madoff. (I believe Sundays are visiting days.) Or Richard S. Fuld Jr., ex-CEO of Lehman Brothers (rest in pieces). Or former U.S. Sen. Phil Gramm, financial industry lackey who legislatively greased the tracks for our economic train wreck with deregulation he spearheaded a decade-plus ago. Or these disgraced (but still mega-wealthy) ex-CEOs: Angelo Mozilo (Countrywide), Martin Sullivan (AIG), Stan O'Neal (Merrill Lynch), Charles Prince (Citigroup).

Given the preceding, as a public employee it kinda wears thin being the ceaseless target of cynically misdirected anger. I mean, calling for the destruction of another's pension because yours was stolen is sorta like demanding the neighbor's house be torched 'cause yours has burned down.

Remember, too, that the same fraudsters painting government workers and teachers as villains (um, teachers? Who's next: firefighters? oh, wait …) also disparage Social Security as an "entitlement," as if being entitled to money you've put into a system your entire working life is, in some Kafkaesque way, criminal. Even better: that renowned economist, Rick Perry, calling Social Security a "Ponzi scheme." (Some might argue capitalism is the biggest Ponzi scheme extant, since, someday, there'll be no new markets to tap. Unless one goes to another planet, and if that's the case, I'd suggest trying the one Rick Perry's from. Maybe we can get our money back.)

Don't buy the hype that Social Security is "broke" or "unsustainable." Two simple fixes would render the fund solvent forever: 1. Removing the Social Security withholding cap of $106,800 (as it stands now, income above that isn't subject to withholding), and 2. Applying Social Security withholding to all income (currently, "unearned" income, like that produced by dividends, capital gains, etc., is exempt).

Problem solved. Ta-da!

So – why the scare tactics? Because no stock market earwig, sorry, bigwig in his right(wing) mind wouldn't want to charge fees on every IRA to come his way if Social Security's gutted. Remember my 401(k)? Total market returns: $6.75.

Total management fees: $7.50.

You're welcome, Mr. Struggling CEO!

Look, I'm not saying that even a healthy Social Security could fund a full-fledged retirement, nor am I urging folks not to save for the future (that is, if they can even save – or eat – at all). My points are these:

• Fortifying Social Security with no reduction in benefits can and should be done. After all, it's only pocket science.

• Beware the divide-and-conquer strategy of manipulative marketeers. Don't turn on your neighbor; instead, join forces to demand economic justice. (Occupy Everything, anyone?)

• Think before gambling, er, investing. (Sorry. Don't know why I confuse the two.)

• As always, follow the money. Most often, it goes straight into the bottomless pockets of financial finaglers who don't give a coughed-up fur ball about you.

'Course, if you're still not convinced, I have three words: cat food futures.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Mark Drolette is a freelance writer who lives in Sacramento.

Read more articles by Mark Drolette



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals