BEITAI VILLAGE, China On a chilly Sunday afternoon this month, Gao Jinghe walked up to the leader of his local township and stabbed him on the side of the face.
Next, Gao went down the hall to the office of the Chinese Communist Party secretary and kicked in the door.
Without uttering a word, Gao sliced through the man's flesh with a knife used to slaughter pigs, according to a police account.
A bottle of gasoline in hand, Gao also reportedly set fires that gutted 26 rooms in the government building of Liuzhangzi Township. After years of challenging what he called corrupt business deals involving officials, many here say, Gao Jinghe had finally snapped.
News of the Jan. 15 attacks was all the more shocking because of Gao's background: He's the elected leader of Beitai Village, which is just down the road from Liuzhangzi and some 140 miles northeast of Beijing.
Gao now sits in a detention cell and his two victims lie in hospital beds. The narrative of his growing frustrations with official corruption in Beitai mirrors other incidents that have led to violence or protest across China.
Such outbursts have so far presented no direct threat to Communist Party rule. Focusing on local power brokers instead of the national government, the unrest remains geographically isolated and limited to short displays of emotion.
Nonetheless, the flare-ups of discontent suggest an ongoing challenge for Beijing during a year in which the core of its central leadership in the Politburo Standing Committee is slated for turnover. With each success the government has in quelling trouble such as defusing a high-profile standoff with villagers at the coastal fishing community of Wukan in December more seems to pop up in another part of the country.
In the area around Beitai, some now praise Gao accused of trying to kill a township Communist Party secretary in broad daylight.
"He is definitely a hero," said one 47-year-old farmer, whose name is being withheld out of concern for possible repercussions of speaking so openly. "He didn't do those things for himself; he did them on behalf of the village."
Several others interviewed in Beitai expressed similar sentiment.
The official explanation for Gao's rampage is simply that a bookkeeping argument with two village bureaucrats, after a festering personal dispute, sent him storming into the township office seeking help. At issue was the reimbursement of a receipt for some $300 in concrete used to rebuild a wall at the village committee building.
When he didn't get what he wanted, police say, Gao went into a rage.
"If he could not get the receipt reimbursed, he was ready to kill people," Liu Zengke, deputy director of the county Public Security Bureau, told McClatchy.
Conversations in Beitai suggested the reason was far broader. A 56-year-old pig farmer with only a primary school education, Gao got voted into office in 2009 on promises that he would clean up village finances.
He had some success scrutinizing the budget in this hamlet of about 1,500 people. But Gao grew increasingly angry as he found it impossible to untangle what he saw as illegal agreements brokered between area officials and businessmen. The reason, he reportedly said, was corruption that reached higher-level government offices.
"He was very upset by the results. He didn't get any support from the relevant government departments," said Meng Xianzhi, 49, a factory worker who had joined Gao in filing complaints against officials. "During village meetings, a lot of villagers were beginning to question him because he wasn't getting anything done."
Gao's son, a 33-year-old construction worker, said his father traveled with villagers to Beijing three or four times in recent years to submit their grievances to the central government. Nothing came of the efforts, said the son.
"There are a lot of corrupt officials in the township, county and city, but our village head was helping villagers file complaints," said a 25-year-old Beitai farmer surnamed Liu, who asked that his full name not be printed.
Asked about the morality of Gao's assaults, the farmer said: "If you look at the incident in a very simple manner then yes, he was guilty. But from a broader point of view, he did nothing wrong."


About Comments
Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.