0 comments | Print

Small school districts win a round in California funding battle

Published: Saturday, Feb. 11, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1B

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Friday that delivers $1 million more dollars to the San Juan Unified School District but takes $900,000 from Elk Grove Unified.

The bill restores $248 million in midyear cuts to school transportation. Legislators had proposed the bill after opponents of the transportation cuts called them unequal and unfair, especially to rural districts where students travel miles to school.

Indeed, the transportation cuts took little to nothing from some school districts while others, such as Amador County, lost about $172 per student.

Now the pendulum is swinging the other direction. The bill will now take about $42 per student from state funding to schools.

"The biggest winners are the real small districts," Sacramento County schools chief David Gordon said.

In Sacramento County, Elverta Joint Union, Arcohe Union and River Delta Union – all districts of fewer then 2,000 students – will collectively save about $300,000 now that the bill has been signed.

Arcohe, a 470-student district in a rural area south of Elk Grove, was slated to lose $153 per student in bus funds. The $42 cut per pupil will save the district $51,000, Gordon said.

It was the plight of small rural districts that drove legislators to draft the bill, Gordon said. "These districts were faced with a double whammy. No. 1, they really needed transportation, and No. 2, it's a much bigger part of their budget and they had fewer things to cut."

Locally, the bill results in more winners than losers.

Amador County schools will lose about $176,000 in state funding for student attendance, instead of the $722,000 it had expected to lose in transportation costs, according to calculations by The Bee.

"We believe it is a much more equitable solution," said Tim Zearley, interim superintendent.

The rural district of 4,200 students has steep, winding, sharp-curved roads making the elimination of busing a dangerous proposition, said district officials.

San Juan Unified will be a big winner.

It expected to lose about $2.5 million in midyear transportation cuts. Now, after calculating the loss of $42 per student and the return of transportation money, the district will come out $1 million better than it had expected, said Trent Allen, district spokesman.

A change in funding won't affect Sacramento City Unified much.

It calculates the bill's signing means it will have to cut $250,000 less than it had expected from its budget this year.

Officials at Twin Rivers Unified are still crunching the numbers, but say they expect the result of the bill's signing to be "a wash" for the district.

This legislation isn't good news for all school districts. Some – those that have severely cut busing or that have little transportation money because of a state formula that leaves them out in the cold – will see big losses.

Elk Grove Unified is one of them. The bill's signing means $900,000 less for the district. The 61,500-student district was to lose $1.5 million in transportation funding, but now faces a $2.4 million cut in daily attendance funding.

Folsom Cordova Unified also expects to take an additional cut in funding with the bill's signing.

The district of 19,500 students would have missed out on $950,000 in transportation money, but now faces $1.56 million in cuts to daily attendance funding – a $600,000 loss.

"While we're relieved it doesn't cut transportation, it levies more of a burden on all of our students," said Stephen Nichols, district spokesman.

Natomas Unified, with just under 10,000 students, will take a hit as well. The district, which had been facing a $69,000 cut to transportation, is now looking at losing $400,000, said Doug Crancer, chief financial officer.

"It isn't a fair solution for everybody, but the feeling was that this was fairer for the largest number of districts," Gordon said of the bill.

Next year, it may be up to districts to decide if they want to fund transportation. The governor is proposing a block-grant funding system that would make funding of most busing optional.

Almost all school districts already subsidize transportation, even if they provide only state and federally mandated busing.

San Juan, for example, spends about $9 million a year to provide only mandated transportation. The state pays the district about $5 million a year for transportation, leaving San Juan to subsidize busing to the tune of $4 million, Allen said.

Sacramento City Unified already has made a move to cut busing, having voted last week to eliminate all but mandatory busing next school year, said Gabe Ross, district spokesman. The district has been providing busing only to elementary school students.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.


Call The Bee's Diana Lambert, (916) 321-1090. Follow her on Twitter @dianalambert.

Read more articles by Diana Lambert



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals