Linda P.B. Katehi, UC Davis chancellor

0 comments | Print

Katehi survives no confidence vote at UC Davis

Published: Saturday, Feb. 18, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1B

A motion asking for a vote of no confidence against UC Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi failed to gain a majority of votes needed to pass, school officials said Friday.

A large majority rejected the motion, with 697 people voting no, or 69 percent of the 1,009 voters. About 37 percent of current and former faculty eligible to vote did so.

Despite the large margin of victory, Friday's results did not mean a clear endorsement for Katehi, her supporters cautioned.

A competing measure calling for a vote of confidence in her leadership did pass, but the resolution also condemned the actions that brought Katehi's leadership under scrutiny: the Nov. 18 pepper-spraying of Occupy UC Davis protesters on the school's campus.

"They rejected the idea of no confidence – that's very clear," said Walter Leal, an entomology professor who was the first professor to sign the confidence measure. "They gave some confidence, but they also gave some criticism. She doesn't have a blank check with this vote."

The competing measure received 59 percent of the vote – 586 yes votes and 408 no votes.

Aldo Antonelli, a philosophy professor and Katehi critic, said he wasn't surprised by Friday's results.

More professors work in fields that have benefited from her leadership – those in agriculture, engineering and veterinarian medicine – than in the humanities, which has suffered under her leadership, he said.

While the pepper-spraying incident brought her leadership to a vote, critics say her problems go deeper.

As state funding is cut, UC Davis, like other UC campuses, has pursued higher tuition from out-of-state students, private donations, and federal and corporate research grants.

Critics say that has meant the "privatization" of the state school, while supporters say her approach is moving the school forward.

It's unclear what effect, if any, a vote of no confidence would have had on her tenure.

The vote was nonbinding, and officials at the University of California could not recall a time when a no confidence vote has been approved on any UC campuses.

The only vote questioning the confidence of a UC chancellor in recent memory took place at the Davis campus six years ago, UC officials said, who added they couldn't remember another such vote.

The vote against former Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef failed, 734 to 320, with about 40 percent of eligible members of the Academic Senate voting.

A UC Davis spokeswoman did not respond to requests from The Bee for a comment from Katehi.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Brad Branan



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals