Photos Loading
previous next
  • JOSÉ LUIS VILLEGAS / jvillegas@sacbee.com

    Sacramento city employees cut down about 50 cottonwood trees in September on a plot of land adjacent to the old city landfill at Sutter's Landing Park. The workers, responding to a complaint that the city was not securing the closed landfill, acted without notifying the City Council or the public.

  • PIA LOPEZ / plopez@sacbee.com

    Sutter's Landing Park offers a view of downtown from the highest point in Sacramento – a mound that is now turning into a meadow, replete with wildlife.

0 comments | Print

Sacramento council OKs spending $200,000 to replace trees at Sutter's Landing Park

Published: Wednesday, Mar. 14, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Wednesday, Mar. 14, 2012 - 7:59 am

The "City of Trees" showed Tuesday night just how much an acre of trees is worth.

The Sacramento City Council voted unanimously to spend more than $200,000 to replace an acre of cottonwood trees cleared last fall from a retention basin in Sutter's Landing Park, near the American River.

A city utilities crew cut down the grove of cottonwood trees in September to evict a large homeless camp that had sprouted up under the canopy. The decision to cut down the trees was made without notifications to either the public or the City Council.

In response, the council formed an eight-member committee of neighborhood and environmental activists to study the incident. A report issued by that committee recommended planting dozens of trees in the area where the cottonwoods had been torn out and in an adjacent area.

That plan, scheduled to be carried out over the next five years, will cost the city $206,000 in planting and maintenance costs. The city spent another $30,000 hiring a consultant team to help the council-appointed committee, and eight city officials assisted the committee.

The report also urged the city to more aggressively seek state and federal grants for the park and to establish clearer policies regulating maintenance of Utilities Department properties.

Councilman Steve Cohn called the clearing of the trees a "disheartening, very disappointing event."

"We did have a failure here in how the city was managing its resources," Cohn said. "But we were big enough to correct it and hopefully come up with procedures to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again."

Utilities officials cut down between 100 and 200 cottonwood trees after homeless campers were found to be cutting a hole in a fence surrounding the former landfill at Sutter's Landing. County officials told the city that the fence cutting created a security risk.

The tree removal upset some council members, who formed the 28th Street Landfill Tree Removal Mitigation Committee.

Committee members worried that the trees – which represented most of the trees in Sutter's Landing – provided essential nesting for wildlife.

According to a tree committee report, the area where the trees were removed "is located in one of the richest areas for raptors along the American River Parkway, especially for the Swainson's hawk, which is a threatened species."

"We've concluded there was definitely some wildlife habitat that was lost," said J.P. Tindell, a planning and development manager with the city's parks department.

"We can debate what the value of that is," Tindell said, but added that planting trees and creating more habitat on an adjacent 2.3-acre plot "is a really good opportunity."

Committee members said maintaining the vast Sutter's Landing Park, situated within view of the downtown skyline, was vital.

"It's a tremendous asset and a gateway to the American River Parkway," said Corey Brown, the committee chairman and a member of Friends of Sutter's Landing Park.

Cohn said replacing the wildlife habitat could be "kind of a watershed moment" for the park.

"I think we are finally reaching that tipping point where we are recognizing that this is a very special place and that we have the possibility of a future that creates a park like no other park in the region," he said.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Ryan Lillis



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals