GREENVILLE A federal judge has decided in favor of the U.S. Forest Service in a dispute over fire-damaged timber volumes with Randy Pew, owner of a Plumas County logging company.
Joseph A. Vergilio, a judge with the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, denied Pew's claim that the Forest Service provided "grossly erroneous estimates" of the charred logs he harvested from the area burned in the 2007 Moonlight fire.
Pew said the agency overestimated the volume of merchantable logs by as much as 90 percent. On the Moonlight sale, Pew said, he relied on the valid estimates the Forest Service has made during his 34 years of purchasing green and fire-damaged trees from the Plumas and other national forests in California.
In his three-page decision released Friday, Vergilio said the agency guaranteed "neither the quantity nor quality or merchantability of the timber" estimated in the contract Pew signed. Pew's reliance on the accuracy of previous Forest Service volume and species estimates is "not reasonable" given the disclaimers included in the contract, the judge said.
Pew entered the dispute resolution process after an agency contracting officer denied his claim for $375,725 for partial damages stemming from the Moonlight fire timber sale.
In January a meeting with Regional Forester Randy Moore left him optimistic that he could reach a settlement with the Forest Service.
"I thought the judge would offer some compromise. It didn't happen," he said.
Pew, whose company is the largest private employer in Indian Valley, said the decision leaves him on the brink of bankruptcy. He has enough timber sales under contract to keep his crew of around 30 employees working for several months, he said.
He has filed another claim seeking several million dollars in damages for helicopter logging sales that required many months of operations covering twice the ground initially expected.
© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.
Read more articles by Jane Braxton Little
What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com
Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)
Here are some rules of the road:
Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.
Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.
Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.
You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at email@example.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.