Sign up for The SacPaws Newsletter     
Submission was successful. Go here to sign up for more newsletters.
There seems to have been an error with your submission. Try again
We're sorry but you are already subscribed.


0 comments | Print

Eight years later, El Dorado County still lacking new animal shelter

Published: Monday, Apr. 23, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Monday, Apr. 23, 2012 - 9:40 am

Not much has gone right in El Dorado County's eight-year effort to build an animal shelter.

The county set aside $7.3 million for the project, but has already spent more than 20 percent with little to show, and without an acceptable new source of funds.

A piece of property purchased for a shelter in 2006 looks now like a white elephant, all but unbuildable.

That purchase obligates the county to build an expensive road to the property that may never serve a shelter.

County supervisors have reversed course at least three times, swinging between building from scratch or retrofitting an existing facility, with each reversal incurring delays and expenses.

Most recently, the board decided again to find a building to retrofit.

"In today's market, you simply cannot build what you can buy," Chief Administrative Officer Terri Daly told the Board of Supervisors in its most recent meeting, April 17.

"I feel very optimistic," said Henry Brzezinski, animal services chief. "I think we're going to find the right place that will work for our program."

Supervisors continue to hedge, making observers nervous.

At the meeting, Supervisor Ron Briggs suggested a new property to build on and Supervisor Jack Sweeney said it's too soon to completely rule out the property bought in 2006.

"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush," Sweeney said.

"I remain hopeful, but based on the long history and all the twists and turns and after the comments (by the board), I don't have a lot of confidence right now," said Barbara Lee of the Animal Shelter Coalition for El Dorado County. "I don't know why I would."

The problem is not just birds in hand. It's dogs, cats, horses, goats – even emus and llamas that need shelter services in the rural county.

"We deal with the whole gamut," Brzezinski said.

El Dorado County currently operates a facility in Placerville where a cat-allergic person wishing to adopt a dog must go through a lobby that functions as the cat-adoption display area, he said.

Quarantine areas are sometimes insufficient and the facility lacks a suitable dog exercise area.

Administrative staff members, including animal control officers, work about a half-mile away.

Horses are kept, under contract, in El Dorado Hills, meaning extra staff travel time.

"We've never really had an adequate shelter in this county," said Charlene Welty, president of People for Animal Welfare in El Dorado County, or PAWED, a support organization for the shelter.

"One of our main concerns is we need to bring this all together," she said.

The county agreed and set the money aside long ago. It acquired 10 acres near Diamond Springs for $450,000 and planned to build there.

In 2010, the county decided to move the shelter to an existing business park instead, but that fell through, and planning resumed for the Diamond Springs property.

Now, the real estate climate and fund shortage is returning the focus to a shelter in an existing commercial structure.

However, the 2006 purchase included an agreement to build an access road serving the shelter and an adjacent property.

"At this point, yes, that's part of the purchase and sales agreement," said Laura Schwartz, budget analyst in the chief administrative office.

No matter where the county puts the shelter, it has to build a road on the old property – another $1.4 million from the $5.8 million left, Schwartz said.

"We call it the road to nowhere," Welty said.

The county doesn't want to put the shelter there, in part because a new facility would cost $2 million to $4 million more than is in the budget, staff estimates.

Finding that money would mean cutting other programs – senior or veterans' programs, for example – or using funds targeted for reserves or capital programs. All are politically unacceptable options.

In addition, oaks on the property must be protected, a matter complicated by a January state appeals court ruling that invalidated key parts of the county's oak woodlands mitigation plan.

All this makes the buy-and-retrofit option the most attractive one – especially since the county's permit to operate in the current location might expire before a brand-new facility could be built.

The county has hired a project manager to expedite things and has promised monthly reports to the board to make sure things don't get sidetracked.

That's the hope. Things have gone wrong before.

As Daly acknowledged to the board, "We, the county, have fumbled many times."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Carlos Alcalá



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals