Fred Keeley, former speaker pro tem of the California Assembly, is the treasurer of Santa Cruz County.

0 comments | Print

Viewpoints: Don't let utilities undermine solar economy

Published: Friday, May. 4, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 17A
Last Modified: Sunday, May. 20, 2012 - 9:37 am

A radiant bright spot is shining through the sea of gloomy economic news in California. The clean energy industry is supplying the state with more than 35,000 high-paying jobs and positioning California at the front of the line for private investment dollars.

California's trademark sunshine and spirit of innovation are sparking a solar power explosion within the clean energy sector, and forward-thinking state policies are making our state's solar industry a global leader. At least $10 billion in private investment has helped turn clean energy into one of the few thriving areas in California's economy, with our state's solar market growing at a pace of up to 40 percent annually.

The cornerstone policy of this solar boom is called net energy metering. Commonly known as the program that lets a customer's electric meter "spin backward," net metering is a simple billing arrangement to ensure that solar customers receive fair credit for the electricity their systems generate. Net metering operates like rollover minutes on a cellphone. When customers don't use all the power their solar panels produce, the extra energy is sent to neighbors, and the owners get credits on their electric bills.

When my colleagues and I authored California's original net metering law, we set out to break down the barriers that prevented and discouraged members of the public from generating clean energy on their rooftops and property.

Since the law took effect in 1996, we have watched our goal become reality. Businesses, school districts and homeowners all benefit from net metering. Taxpayers, too. California schools, water districts, local governments and nonprofits will save $2.5 billion in electricity costs over the next 30 years of operations of net metered systems. Schools will save $1.5 billion.

Even though 43 states have followed California's lead with net metering policies, investor-owned utilities in our state are seeking to unravel net metering. Last year, San Diego Gas & Electric attempted to impose a "network access charge" on solar users, in effect levying a solar tax that would cost ratepayers with solar systems millions of dollars. The California Public Utilities Commission wisely rejected SDG&E's surcharge.

The utilities now are turning to the state Legislature in a new attempt to undermine the solar economy. They are backing Assembly Bill 2514 by Assemblyman Steven Bradford, D-Gardena, that would undercut action by the PUC to allow another 2.1 gigawatts – roughly the total amount of solar-powered electricity generated in the state last year – to be added onto the grid.

As it stands, our net metering law caps the amount of electricity that customers can put back on the grid at 5 percent of aggregate customer peak demand. But the original law did not specify how utilities should calculate that number. Consequently, utilities are using a more restrictive approach that halves the amount of solar power that can be net metered.

That is why I joined the state's solar industry in asking the PUC to clarify the way it calculates the amount of power being put onto the grid. Earlier this month, the PUC issued a proposed decision clarifying that utilities should use a new cap calculation process that results in more California businesses and other ratepayers having access to the energy bill saving benefits of net metering. Take it from me, that was the intent of the law as we wrote it.

Yet the utilities are now trying to short-circuit the PUC action, seeking to slip their own self-serving language into legislation and subvert the agency carefully selected to regulate the state's energy policy and protect California consumers and business.

Make no mistake, this utility-backed legislation will stymie job growth and threaten our state's clean energy leadership position. As author of our net metering law, I implore lawmakers to resist this special interest maneuver to change the law. Instead, I urge the Legislature to join with Gov. Jerry Brown, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, the PUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates, the Solar Energy Industries Association and the California Farm Bureau Federation in supporting the PUC's proposed decision on net metering and protecting Californians' ability to generate clean solar energy.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Fred Keeley



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals