J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, right, finishes his speech denouncing gay marriage as a group of pastors from across denominational lines gather on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 24, 2012, during a news conference to show their support for the Defense of Marriage Act. At center, Reggie Mazyck holds an open letter addressed to President Barack Obama written by Harry R. Jackson, Jr., senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville, Md.

0 comments | Print

CalPERS must offer long-term care coverage to same-sex couples, federal judge rules

Published: Friday, May. 25, 2012 - 10:34 am
Last Modified: Friday, May. 25, 2012 - 11:14 am

In a landmark case involving CalPERS and gay rights, a federal judge in Oakland ruled that the big pension fund must offer its long-term care insurance coverage to same-sex spouses and partners.

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken struck down a portion of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the 1996 law that defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

Some 160,000 state workers have purchased long-term care insurance through the California Public Employees' Retirement System. The coverage pays for stays in nursing homes and assisted-living centers.

CalPERS has refused to make the coverage available to same-sex spouses or domestic partners. While the pension fund extends most benefits to same-sex couples, it says the 1996 federal law left it little choice but to deny them the long-term care insurance.

The insurance benefits are tax-exempt under federal law, and CalPERS said extending the coverage to gay couples would jeopardize the program's tax-free status.

A group of Bay Area state workers, along with their spouses and partners, sued CalPERS and the federal government in early 2010. The Obama administration has declined to defend the 1996 law, so a Republican-led group of congressmen known as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group intervened to oppose the lawsuit.

Wilken, in a 41-page ruling, said the ban on long-term care insurance "appears to be motivated by anti-gay animus." The provision in the federal law "violates the Constitution's equal protection guarantee," she added.

Her ruling wasn't a surprise. In a preliminary ruling in January, the judge indicated she believed the provision in the 1996 law was unconstitutional.

A similar ruling, in a separate case, was issued in February by a federal judge in San Francisco. That case is being appealed by the Republican congressional group.

CalPERS applauded the ruling.

"We have been strongly advocating for the ability to administer our program for same-sex spouses and domestic partners," said Chief Executive Anne Stausboll in a prepared statement.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Dale Kasler



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals