0 comments | Print

New Central Valley flood protection plan backs trees on levees

Published: Saturday, Jun. 30, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3B

A new flood protection plan approved Friday for California's Central Valley takes a firm stand against a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers policy that could require trees and shrubs to be stripped from levees in the region.

The new Central Valley Flood Protection Plan calls for improvements over several decades that are estimated to cost $17 billion.

It will be funded initially by $5 billion in flood-control bonds approved by state voters in 2007. It likely will require another $5 billion bond, plus local and federal matching funds.

The plan will guide flood-safety improvements for the foreseeable future and must be updated every five years.

Its many projects include enlarging the Yolo Bypass, adding a flood bypass on the San Joaquin River, building more setback levees to widen river channels, and setting new operating criteria at dams to heed weather conditions and a changing climate.

Mandated by 2008 legislation, the plan aims to achieve 200-year flood protection in urban areas while improving wildlife habitat and protecting agriculture in rural areas. It is the most comprehensive effort of its kind in a century.

The Central Valley Flood Protection Board, a state agency, approved the plan unanimously after months of public hearings. It was ultimately supported by environmental groups and flood-control agencies.

Ronald Stork, senior policy analyst at Friends of the River, called the plan "a thoughtful framework for future improvements to the flood system that promises to be more river- and environment-friendly."

The board made two major changes to the draft plan, prepared by engineers at the state Department of Water Resources. The biggest deals with a 2007 Corps policy allowing only grass on levees.

The state has been negotiating with the Corps for years to amend the policy, arguing that removing millions of trees threatens wildlife habitat and would yield little flood-protection benefit.

After those negotiations stalled, the state Department of Fish and Game earlier this year filed suit, saying the Corps failed to follow the Endangered Species Act and other federal laws in adopting the rule.

The flood board agreed with that assertion. The new plan approved Friday makes it official state policy that California will not follow the Corps vegetation rule.

Instead, when approving future flood-control projects, the board will allow trees and shrubs on the lower, water-side sections of all levees. Also, all other existing vegetation is allowed to remain on levees "until the end of the natural life" of those plants.

Both conditions are subject to pruning criteria so levees can be inspected.

The board also postponed a proposal for a new flood bypass on the Feather River until the plan's 2017 update, saying it needs further study.

"We listened carefully to residents and flood experts, farmers, property owners and local governments, levee districts, scientists and environmentalists," board President Bill Edgar said in a statement.

LEARN MORE

For more information on the plan, visit sacbee.com/links

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Matt Weiser



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals