Randy Pench / Bee file, 2008

Burned pines rise from a Plumas County area burned in the 2007 Moonlight fire. A federal suit sought $700 million in damages.

0 comments | Print

Feds settle suit over Moonlight fire

Published: Friday, Jul. 6, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Wednesday, Jul. 18, 2012 - 6:25 am

The dispute that turned into a legal free-for-all over who started one of the most destructive wildfires in California history was settled Thursday.

The United States' lawsuit against Sierra Pacific Industries, the largest single landholder in North America, and others was scheduled to go to trial last Monday before U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. But U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows agreed to make a last-ditch effort to resolve the case, and the trial was delayed for one week.

The terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

The government has been seeking approximately $700 million for alleged damage to 46,000 acres of national forest in Plumas and Lassen counties caused by the Moonlight fire in 2007. It is the government's contention that the fire was started by a spark that jumped into dry undergrowth when a bulldozer working a timber project hit a rock.

U.S. Attorney Benjamin Wagner would not discuss the settlement's terms. He said he will have something to say when the agreement has been signed by all parties. The target date for that is Wednesday, according to minutes of Thursday's negotiations.

The settlement was reached in midafternoon Thursday, but the minutes were posted on the docket near the end of the business day. They say: "CASE SETTLED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Written settlement agreement to be completed by tomorrow 7/6/2012, and signed by all parties by Wednesday, 7/11/2012."

Settlement conferences are typically closed.

Sitting down with Hollows on June 27 were attorneys for the government, for Sierra Pacific, for the owners of private Plumas County land where the fire started, for the owners' property management firm that retained Sierra Pacific on the timber project, and for a logging company hired by Sierra Pacific to perform the harvest. Also present were company officers from Sierra Pacific.

Negotiators gathered again before Hollows on Monday. In addition to the lawyers, principals of Sierra Pacific were again present, plus an insurance representative for the logging company, the company's owner, and four of the property owners.

In attendance at Thursday's resumption of negotiations were the lawyers, the owner of the property management firm, and former U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott. It is unclear what Scott's role was. He is a partner in the Sacramento office of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, a firm that has never before appeared on the public record of the suit.

Notably, Sierra Pacific officers were not present and only one of its attorneys was there, indicating its part of the settlement may have been largely decided before Thursday. Four of its attorneys were there Monday.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Denny Walsh



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals