Protesters hold signs at a rally Thursday expressing their views on levels of soot pollution. The federal Environmental Protection Agency heard public opinions on the topic at all-day hearings. Randy Pench rpench@sacbee.com

0 comments | Print

EPA hears public views of changes to soot standard

Published: Friday, Jul. 20, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 4A
Last Modified: Sunday, Jul. 22, 2012 - 12:21 pm

Jesse and Jessika Hernandez were barely a year old when the twins contracted asthma.

Now, at age 10, they grapple with the illness every day, missing school and ending up in a hospital, because of the poor air quality in their native Fresno.

The two were among several dozen that attended the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Sacramento hearing on national air quality standards Thursday. The agency is proposing a change to the annual standard for soot and is seeking the public's input.

"We're here today to listen," EPA spokeswoman Alison Davis said.

At the hearing, regulators got an earful. Some decried the agency for not protecting public health, while others blamed regulations for driving them out of business.

"It's a difficult balancing act," said Errol Villegas, program manager for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. "How do we balance public health with jobs?"

The San Joaquin Valley is among the worst-polluted areas in the nation.

Current EPA rules for soot allow 15 micrograms per cubic meter, but the agency is now proposing 12 or 13 micrograms. Environmentalists have said that's not enough – they want 11 instead.

The stakes for California are high. It is one of the worst soot-polluted states in the country.

The American Lung Association said 70 percent of California's soot pollution originates in the transportation industry, with trucks, trains and airplanes the biggest polluters. The remaining 30 percent comes from power plants, manufacturing and home sources.

Robert McClernon, a former trucker, said the current regulations "destroyed" his livelihood. In 2009, McClernon said he was forced to close his trucking business, because his equipment didn't meet EPA rules.

But Tony Wexler, director of the Air Quality Research Center at UC Davis, believes the financial cost of clean air is justified.

"It's cheaper to have stricter regulations, because health costs are much higher," Wexler said. "Industry groups only see the costs in front of them."

Environmentalist and clean air groups were out in full force at the hearing, with a slew of representatives testifying before the five-member panel. Only a handful of speakers, mostly from business groups, argued for maintaining the current standard. The Sierra Club led a small rally at Cesar Chavez Plaza across from the California EPA building, where the hearing was held.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Richard Chang



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals