Jon Ortiz

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: No theft in Parks Department's leave-time cashouts

Published: Thursday, Jul. 26, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 - 8:13 pm

Here's one of the best things you can say about the Department of Parks and Recreation's cash-for-leave mess and the ensuing funding scandal: At least the state workers involved didn't steal money.

They did expose a flaw in the state's budgeting system. They did damage state workers' public image. They did breach the public trust. But they didn't steal.

Auditors have been dissecting how parks employees pulled off the scheme, first reported by The Bee's Matt Weiser, that cashed out about $270,000 of leave time on the books for 56 department managers in Sacramento.

State workers cash out leave when they exit state service unless they have permission to do it earlier. That didn't happen here.

Auditors dispatched by state Controller John Chiang have found that one parks manager and one supervisor reported the leave-time buyouts as "straight overtime," meaning they went to Chiang's office for payment last summer at the regular wage rate, not at time-and-a-half.

"That's why it didn't set off any alarm bells," Chiang spokesman Jacob Roper said.

The two unnamed employees had some ethics – they deducted the corresponding hours from the 56 leave accounts, Roper said. That avoided outright theft.

"We have suspended their access to the payroll system," Roper added.

Departments handle their own payroll accounting, then pass the numbers to the controller for check writing. While Chiang's office has "some internal controls in place" to catch irregularities, the scope and complexity of the leave cashout program made detection nearly impossible, Roper said.

The Bee's inquiries led to the revelation last week that some officials knew of $54 million parked in two department accounts.

Gov. Jerry Brown, who wants Californians to vote for his November tax measure, on Wednesday put heavy upspin on the story: "This is the first problem I've ever seen where actually people in government saved money, and that's good, because we have the money and we can use it."

Well, OK, but somehow his Department of Finance didn't know about all that money. Chiang's office had the information, but finance officials didn't use it. See the problem?

The administration has launched its own audit of Parks and Recreation and a more sweeping review of the state's budget reporting practices, Finance Department spokesman H.D. Palmer said Wednesday.

No audit can change history, which will forever note that Parks and Recreation went begging to the private sector for money to keep facilities open while it sat on millions of dollars.

Businesses, volunteers and philanthropists stepped up. West Sacramento-based Raley's, for example, kicked in $75,000 to keep the Governor's Mansion open.

Now imagine next year if the state really is desperate. Will Raley's step up again?

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals