0 comments | Print

What Caltrans has said

Published: Saturday, Aug. 4, 2012 - 9:00 pm | Page 15A
Last Modified: Sunday, Aug. 5, 2012 - 3:24 pm

The Bee first reported last November that a Caltrans employee falsified data on radiation tests of foundations of freeway structures, and conducted tests on foundation piles of the new Bay Bridge main tower foundation without ensuring the accuracy of his equipment. Since then Caltrans has responded to concerns about the gamma-gamma radiation tests and complementary sonic-wave tests in sometimes contradictory ways:

SONIC TESTS

"(Sonic tests) verified that the piles were fine."

– Tony Anziano, Caltrans toll bridge program manager, Nov. 14 on KQED radio

On May 27, The Bee reported sonic-wave tests showed a 19-foot anomaly in Pile 3 of the main bridge tower. Experts said radiation tests are not designed to detect that type of problem. In June, Caltrans Director Malcolm Dougherty and other agency officials rejected those concerns, noting that sonic tests are neither required nor used by Caltrans to check concrete strength. Yet agency documents show Caltrans often has ordered or conducted its own sonic tests of foundation piles – including on other sections of the Bay Bridge seismic upgrade.

Sonic tests are "a type of testing that we actually do not require and we do not use for very specific reasons to assess concrete strength."

— Anziano, June 15 in Caltrans online presentation

RADIATION TESTS

"There's been thorough review" of the radiation tests of the Bay Bridge piles, and no problems were found.

— Caltrans Director Dougherty, on KQED radio, May 30

On May 24 a Caltrans team reviewing the test data informed agency executives of data problems with radiation tests on one pile among 13 that make up the main tower foundation of the new Bay Bridge. On June 1, agency executives were informed that another pile in that foundation also has suspect data.

Dougherty stands by his statement about the radiation tests. The report by Caltrans engineers raising questions about the tests is "preliminary."

— Caltrans spokesman Matt Rocco, in The Bee today, Aug. 5.

FALSIFICATION

Caltrans found no strings of copied and pasted test data in the Bay Bridge records. That method is "the only realistic way to falsify this data."

– Caltrans Director Dougherty, at a Nov. 22 legislative hearing

On June 1, a Caltrans team reviewing radiation test data informed executives that more than 1,000 data files on freeway structures, including the new Bay Bridge, statewide have been doctored or show a wide range of irregularities, beyond evidence of strings of data copied and pasted.

"… the Team cannot predict the number of significant irregularities that will be discovered in the process of reviewing the remaining results."

– Caltrans engineers, June 1 report

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals