0 comments | Print

'Betrayed' lawmakers question California state budget accounting

Published: Friday, Aug. 10, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Aug. 21, 2012 - 9:24 pm

In their first examination of state accounting problems, California lawmakers condemned parks officials Thursday for hiding nearly $54 million from budget writers.

The revelation has damaged the integrity of state government and its budget process, lawmakers from both parties said at an Assembly budget subcommittee hearing.

"Many of us here today feel betrayed," said Assemblyman Bob Blumenfield, D–Woodland Hills, chairman of the Assembly Budget Committee. "It's our constitutional duty as state legislators to craft the state budget. And the credibility of this year's budget has been tarnished."

Officials from the Department of Finance and state controller's office told legislators they will install new cross-checks to verify that figures for 560-plus special funds are consistent across their different sets of books. Previously, state departments were largely responsible for keeping their own special fund accounting in order.

Finance Director Ana Matosantos testified that her department has found no other instances where departments purposely shielded funds in the way that parks officials apparently had for years.

In a quick audit released last week, the Finance Department found $268.5 million of accounting errors, both positive and negative, in a special fund universe that spent $33.4 billion in 2010-11. The errors netted $196.7 million more in state accounts than finance officials knew about in late 2011 as they crafted Gov. Jerry Brown's January budget.

Matosantos told the committee that $143 million of surplus money found in a beverage container recycling fund and a children's health account was discovered before the budget process ended in June.

Jason Sisney of the Legislative Analyst's Office testified that while the hidden parks money was "unacceptable," the Department of Finance uses different accounting than the controller's office and may have legitimate reasons for having separate figures. "Different reports are prepared at different times for different purposes," he said.

Matosantos said her department is still exploring whether any of the erroneous accounting means funds are actually available. Among the most likely is $28.8 million in the cash-strapped Restitution Fund, which reimburses crime victims for funeral expenses and health care. Sisney said, "I take them at their word for that."

But that wasn't enough to satisfy all lawmakers. Assemblywoman Diane Harkey, R-Dana Point, called for an independent review of special funds, noting that "we've lost public trust with this exposé."

"I would like to have just an outside audit that tell me these (numbers) reconcile," she said.

Assemblywoman Holly J. Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, was particularly interested in the Restitution Fund money because some constituents have told her they must wait several years to be reimbursed. "Short of you all having conducted some kind of forensic audit, I don't know that you are in a position to say without a doubt there's no other money out there," Mitchell told Matosantos. "I just don't know that you're in a position to do that."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Kevin Yamamura



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals