Jon Ortiz

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: Are engineers and scientists going soft on Jerry Brown?

Published: Thursday, Aug. 16, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 - 8:13 pm

Are two unions known for fearlessly fighting state worker furloughs going soft?

Exhibit A: Gov. Jerry Brown last week appealed a court order to restore lost wages to about 14,000 state engineers and scientists who received two extra furlough days in April 2011. Alameda Superior Court Judge Steven Brick also ordered up to 70 days of pay for 250 workers in those classes whose jobs should have been exempt from furloughs entirely.

Brown's appeal freezes about $12 million in back pay while the case climbs up the legal ladder. When Brown's GOP predecessor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, did that sort of stuff it drove the unions crazy.

Brown may personally believe furloughs are bad business – his 2010 campaign said so – and he's certainly not eager to write a big furlough paycheck. Just imagine the ads against the governor's November tax measure if he did: "Jerry Brown paid $12 million to state workers to stay home – and now he wants to raise your taxes??"

The unions understand this. They also want to support the guy they helped elect and will have to deal with when contract talks start next spring. They don't have much choice.

So when pressed for comment about Brown's appeal, California Association of Professional Scientists' President David Miller fired back – but not at Brown.

"We were hoping to put an end to this Schwarzenegger-era furlough litigation," Miller said in an email.

Exhibit B: After pay-cut talks between Brown and the engineers union broke down in June, the governor imposed a one-day-per-month furlough on the 12,000 or so members of Professional Engineers in California Government.

If Schwarzenegger had done that, PECG would have revved up its lawyers, sharpened its talking points and called the media to protest.

PECG was among the first to sue over furloughs nearly four years ago. The union has a fixed place in labor history as a party in PECG v. Schwarzenegger, the state Supreme Court's key 2010 ruling that the Legislature deputized the former governor to furlough workers.

This time PECG went a different route, quietly filing a June 4 grievance claiming the administration violated PECG's contract by recommending that the Legislature fund only 95 percent of the hourly wage terms in the agreement. It's a roundabout way of protesting the furlough itself.

The grievance is a low-profile alternative to a lawsuit. It's like the difference between family therapy and a fistfight in the street.

Bruce Blanning, PECG's executive director, said the union still has options, including the lawsuit route.

"The governor was critical of his predecessor, but now he's appealing this decision – and he's chosen to impose furloughs on our members," Blanning said during a Wednesday interview. "We're looking at those actions that may appear to be somewhat inconsistent. We haven't determined a course of action."

When Schwarzenegger was in office, there wouldn't have been any debate.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals