0 comments | Print

Editorial: Public-safety benefits change deserves a veto

Published: Thursday, Aug. 30, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 14A

If anyone needed further evidence that certain public employee unions have inordinate control over the Legislature, look no further than lawmakers' overwhelming approval of a bill that doubles the statute of limitations for death benefits for police and firefighters.

Despite opposition from beleaguered California cities and counties, Assembly Bill 2451 by Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez easily passed out of both houses of the Legislature. It now sits on Gov. Jerry Brown's desk, where it awaits final action. The governor should veto it.

The bill is not the outrageous giveaway it was when it shot out of the Assembly back in May with only four "no" votes. After several critical editorials in The Bee, Pérez scaled back the benefit. It no longer eliminates the statute of limitation on death benefits entirely. In its original form the bill would have allowed survivors of public safety officers who succumb from cancer or heart disease or other ailments presumed under law to be job-related to collect benefits worth $250,000 at a minimum, decades after they retire.

Under the amended bill, the deceased public safety officer would have to die within about nine years rather than the 4 1/2 years set in current law, for his survivors to be eligible for the benefit. Heart attacks wouldn't count. Also, the relative seeking the benefit would have to be a dependent of the officer at the time of the officer's death, not a grown son or daughter or brother-in-law, who might have lived with the deceased officer decades before.

The scaled-back bill greatly reduces the potential liability for the state, counties and cities. But given the financial crisis state and local governments face, the question remains: Why should the Legislature place any additional financial burden on cities, counties and the state?

The governor recently reimposed furloughs on state workers. He is crisscrossing the state begging voters to approve tax increases to prevent more massive cuts to schools.

The city of Stockton filed for bankruptcy protection, in part because of overly generous retirement benefits it had granted to police and firefighters. Other California cities are on the brink. They are laying off workers, including cops and firefighters, and asking those still on the job to accept furloughs, forgo pay raises and contribute more for benefits.

In the midst of it all, a clueless Legislature ladles out another costly benefit to the most lavishly paid and pensioned public employees in the state – police, firefighters and prison guards. It's hard not to conclude that certain powerful special interests – police, fire and correctional officer unions, chief among them – own this Legislature.

Now the question becomes: Do they own the governor, too? Will he sign this bill?

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by the Editorial Board



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals