Hotly contested legislation to create a new statewide teacher evaluation system was shelved Thursday night, one day before the Legislature adjourns for the year.
Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes made the decision after learning that there would not be time for a public hearing on last-minute amendments.
"I could not in good conscience allow the proposed amendments to be voted on without a full public hearing," the Sylmar Democrat said in a prepared statement. "I believe this issue is too important to be decided at the last minute and in the dark of night."
Fuentes' Assembly Bill 5 had sparked a deep split within the education community with the California Teachers Association supporting it and groups for school administrators and school boards opposed.
Fuentes' goal was to create a new system that would evaluate teachers more often, using multiple measurements and more extensive observations than districts use now.
A lightning rod for controversy, however, was Fuentes' proposal to collectively bargain all aspects of any evaluation system.
Fuentes would have required the evaluation system to take into consideration progress on student test scores, but the weight given to that and other measurements would have been decided at the bargaining table.
Opponents said that leaving key details to collective bargaining would have resulted in an evaluation system with no teeth.
The finishing touches and last-minute amendments to AB 5 were being made less than three months after a Los Angeles judge ruled that California's largest school district was violating state law by failing to use student test scores in evaluating teachers.
Fuentes vowed to continue the fight even after he is termed out of the Assembly this year.
© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.
Read more articles by Jim Sanders
What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com
Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)
Here are some rules of the road:
Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.
Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.
Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.
Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.
Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.
Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.
Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.
Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.
Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.
You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.
If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.