Jon Ortiz

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: What can public worker unions learn from NFL refs?

Published: Thursday, Oct. 4, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 - 8:16 pm

A new contract for a small band of unionized industry regulators, locked out until last week, literally prompted standing ovations around the country.

So, National Football League Referees Association, got any lessons to pass along to public employees?

Public unions have a PR problem. Until a few weeks ago, NFL refs were like many government employees: largely unnoticed, occasionally booed.

Then a blown call by replacement officials last month handed the Green Bay Packers an undeserved loss at the end of a nationally televised game. A public outcry followed for the league to get the regular refs back on the field.

Two days later, the NFL and the union cut a deal that raises the refs' pay over seven years from the current average of $149,000 per year to $205,000, phases out traditional pensions for current refs and brings new hires in under a 401(k) plan. And the refs are part-timers.

The deal highlights how relatively little the public cares about what unionized private industry employees earn. Who cares what the referees get paid? Most games still sell out, and you can choose whether to buy the ticket.

"But the perception of public employee compensation is, 'These are my taxes,' " said Ken Mayer, a professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. " 'I don't have a choice whether to consume.' "

A sensational visual aid helps. "The league thought it could get by with replacements," Mayer said. "It's not true. That (Packers) game made it obvious."

Public employee labor groups often argue that nonunion replacements – private contractors, charter school teachers and the like – lack the skill, experience or commitment of unionized civil servants.

The difference, however, is the government's lack of instant replay. It's not always "obvious" why a program gets off track or succeeds, or whether different workers would perform better or worse.

That's at the core of arguments over everything from charter schools to privatized prisons. Unlike the clearly blown Packers call, it's not obvious which side is right. So unions will always have to spend resources debating that judgment call.

The pension fight is everywhere. Why was a $9 billion league willing to lock out 121 refs whose total pay and benefits cost between $3 million and $5 million per year?

"The biggest issue was pensions," Mayer said. "The owners don't like them. It wasn't the money. It was the symbolism."

The new deal caps the 121 current refs' defined benefit pensions at 20 years of service. After that, they fall under a self-managed 401(k) plan. Future hires will go straight into a 401(k).

The NFL is wildly successful, yet it's dumping traditional employee pensions. Public-sector unions want to escape the trend, but the refs' deal reveals that the social and political pressure in that direction will continue as government budgets continue to struggle.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals