MANNY CRISOSTOMO / Bee file, 2008

Several projects meant to protect and enhance the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta have been agreed to by members of a coalition that has been meeting to work out compromises for competing interests. A list of projects was released today by the coalition.

0 comments | Print

Agreement on Delta projects emerges from water-management coalition meetings

Published: Monday, Oct. 15, 2012 - 12:36 pm
Last Modified: Wednesday, Mar. 27, 2013 - 11:54 pm

They have fought for years over water management in California's sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Now these longtime foes have managed to agree on a variety of short-term projects to help the estuary.

The Coalition to Support Near Term Delta Projects has met quietly for the past six months. With help from the Center for Collaborative Policy at Sacramento State University, the group managed to agree on 43 projects supported by all participants, from water titans like the Westlands Water District to local levee maintenance agencies in the Delta itself.

"It's pretty remarkable," said Tom Zuckerman, an attorney for the Central Delta Water Agency, which serves a number of major property owners in the Delta. "I know some of these projects will get done. It's just a question of how far the existing funding goes."

Zuckerman and other key participants presented the coalition's project list today at a hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Delta Stewardship and Sustainability.

One of the biggest projects is strengthening levees along two key Delta watercourses -- Middle River and Old River -- at a cost of about $180 million. This could protect Delta islands from floods and earthquakes, and help protect statewide water supplies that would be jeopardized if those levees failed. Which is how the group reached agreement: The projects are things that had broad benefits.

The group also lived by an important ground rule. No projects would be considered that might preclude action on the major controversy that has divided them in recent years: A proposal, still being debated, for a pair of massive tunnels that would divert Sacramento River water out of the Delta. The $14 billion proposal is bitterly opposed by Delta residents and many environmental groups.

This ground rule allowed support to emerge for the 43 smaller projects, which total about $1 billion and include habitat restoration, wildlife research and water quality projects. The latter includes a proposal to recycle the Sacramento region's treated sewage into a water supply for irrigation purposes.

"We can't wait, and we need to find more of these kinds of collaborative, mutually beneficial, no-brainer things to do," said Jason Peltier, chief deputy general manager at Westlands Water District, which provides farm irrigation water diverted from the Delta to a large swath of the San Joaquin Valley.

What happens next with the project list remains unclear. The Legislative Analyst's Office reported that more than $500 million is available for the projects in two existing bond measures. Some projects already have money available from local governments or ratepayers. Some projects will require action by the Legislature or key regulatory agencies before construction can begin.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Matt Weiser



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals