Ringo Chiu / ZUMA24.com

July 26, 2012 - San Bernardino, California, U.S. - San Bernardino must cut government spending by a third as the Southern California city heads for bankruptcy court. Widespread layoffs and pay cuts are expected. Pictured: July 12, 2012 - San Bernardino, California, U.S. - People walk in the civic center. The San Bernardino City Council voted this week to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection, making San Bernardino the second largest municipality in the nation ever to file for bankruptcy and the third in California to opt for bankruptcy in the past two weeks. (Credit Image: © Ringo Chiu/ZUMA24.com)

0 comments | Print

CalPERS challenges San Bernardino's bankruptcy effort

Published: Friday, Oct. 26, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 6B

Facing a direct challenge from a city that won't pay its bills, CalPERS is firing back.

CalPERS formally challenged the city of San Bernardino's right to file for bankruptcy protection after the city fell behind on $5.2 million in payments.

The powerful pension fund, in a lengthy court filing, suggested that San Bernardino is trying to use the bankruptcy laws to get out of paying its bills.

The city's actions raise "a serious question of whether its underlying purpose has been merely to 'buy time' or evade creditors," CalPERS said in a filing late Wednesday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Riverside.

San Bernardino officials have said they aren't trying to pick a fight with the California Public Employees' Retirement System. Rather, they say they simply can't pay the city's bills, and CalPERS is just one of several creditors that's getting stiffed. The city filed for Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy in August.

CalPERS hasn't cut off San Bernardino's retirement benefits but pledged last week to "assert its rights and remedies available under the law" to collect the money it's owed.

Ultimately, CalPERS could terminate San Bernardino's pension program, which would almost certainly leave the city's municipal retirees with less-generous benefits than they were promised.

In objecting to the bankruptcy petition, CalPERS said the protection under the Chapter 9 law gives the city an "inherent advantage" over creditors.

But Karol Denniston, a San Francisco bankruptcy attorney not connected to the case, said getting the filing dismissed won't solve the underlying dispute.

"There's still no more money and San Bernardino still has to do its restructuring," she said.

CalPERS also complained that the city had implied it would keep making its required payments to the pension fund.

Until fairly recently, public-employee pensions were considered sacred – and participating cities and counties faithfully made their payments to CalPERS.

Vallejo considered lowering benefits after going bankrupt in 2008, but backed off after CalPERS made threatening noises.

That attitude is changing as municipalities cope with sluggish tax revenue and escalating retirement costs. In Stockton, CalPERS is under assault from two bond insurance companies facing heavy losses in that city's bankruptcy case. The two companies are trying to cut off the city's payments to CalPERS.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Dale Kasler



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals