Election 2012
Photos Loading
previous next
  • RENÉE C. BYER / rbyer@sacbee.com

    Election clerks Patrick Ditty, left, and Karl Vostrez on Wednesday prepare some vote-by-mail ballots received by the Sacramento County Elections Office. More than 75,000 were turned in at polling places on Election Day.

  • RENÉE C. BYER / rbyer@sacbee.com

    Sacramento County election clerk Yolanda Martinez visually inspects vote-by-mail ballots Wednesday for errors that would cause them to be disqualified.

  • RENÉE C. BYER / rbyer@sacbee.com

    Election clerks Patrick Ditty, left, and Karl Vostrez on Wednesday prepare some vote-by-mail ballots received by the Sacramento County Elections Office. More than 75,000 were turned in at polling places on Election Day.

  • RENÉE C. BYER / rbyer@sacbee.com

    Sacramento County election clerk Yolanda Martinez visually inspects vote-by-mail ballots Wednesday for errors that would cause them to be disqualified.

0 comments | Print

Some Sacramento County races too close to call; thousands of absentee ballots must be tallied

Published: Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012 - 12:17 pm

You know which presidential candidate will be in the White House for the next four years.

What you won't know for two weeks or more is who emerged victorious in the race for Sacramento City Council districts 2 and 4.

In District 2, is it former Councilman Rob Kerth? Or developer Allen Warren?

In District 4, did biotech firm manager Steve Hansen get the nod? Or architect Joe Yee?

The same goes for Sacramento's District 7 of the U.S. House of Representatives: Candidate Ami Bera? Or Rep. Dan Lungren?

Don't hold your breath.

Outcomes of some key, tight races likely won't be known until Sacramento County elections workers plow through more than 193,000 outstanding ballots and issue a series of updates over the next two weeks.

The next update is due Friday at 3 p.m.

Turns out, the 2012 general presidential election opened the floodgates to a tidal wave of vote-by-mail ballots.

In all, 59 percent of the county's 698,899 registered voters asked for vote-by-mail ballots. And an astonishing 75,000 of these weren't mailed to county offices or deposited at one of the county's 14 drop-off sites.

Instead, voters carried them into polling places on Election Day. Some even filled them out at the precincts, including some opting to do so in the privacy of a voting booth.

"They enjoy getting it at home and marking it," Registrar Jill LaVine theorized. "And they like the idea of putting it in the ballot box. It's the best of both worlds."

Even so, the volume of vote-by-mail ballots dropped off at the county's collection sites soared, from 5,000 in the June primary to 27,000 for the general election, LaVine said.

The pattern of heavy vote-by-mail balloting has been growing statewide, rising 15 percent in the last two years, according to data from the California secretary of state's office.

Flash-forward to Wednesday – the day after the election.

LaVine described what came next, starting with the enormous volume of bags that arrived overnight from the county's 470 polling places carrying the vote-by-mail ballots.

There would be no votes counted Wednesday, she said. Instead, scores of workers would begin pulling ballots out of the bags, putting them into trays for sorting.

The signatures on the vote-by-mail ballots had to be verified, then sorted by precinct. Ballots would be opened, unfolded and inspected for peanut butter and jelly or coffee stains and the like.

"I know what some voters had for breakfast," LaVine quipped.

The actual count resumes at 8 a.m. today.

Among the closest races in the region were two Sacramento City Council contests.

In the race for District 4 – a high-profile seat representing Land Park, the Central City and the River Oaks section of South Natomas – just 28 votes separated the candidates out of more than 16,000 ballots counted so far. The latest, limited data, had Hansen leading Yee, 49.99 percent to 49.79 percent.

And in north Sacramento, the margin between Kerth and Warren in District 2 had slimmed to 63 votes, with nearly 8,000 ballots counted.

Kerth had held a double-digit lead in early returns but saw that advantage dwindle to 50.2 percent to 49.4 percent by early Wednesday.

"We put up a strong challenge, and I feel like it's not over yet," Warren said.

Uncertainty also prevailed in the Natomas Unified School District, where as of Wednesday just a few hundred votes separated some of the four candidates vying for three seats on the board.

In the Rio Linda-Elverta water district, where nothing seems to go smoothly, the top four vote-getters for three open seats were separated Wednesday by fewer than 300 votes.

Why aren't these numbers good enough to assess candidate strength?

Simple. As of Wednesday, Sacramento County elections officials had processed and tallied a total of 328,516 votes.

That's far short of the more than 500,000 ballots expected to be part of the final count.

The county, as a legal matter, has until Dec. 4 to finish processing ballots.

"Hang on, we'll get there," LaVine said. "We always do."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Loretta Kalb



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals