Election 2012

Autumn Payne / apayne@sacbee.com

0 comments | Print

Davis school leaders hail extension of parcel tax

Published: Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 5B

Davis Joint Unified School District leaders sounded the alarm and voters responded, narrowly passing parcel tax Measure E to maintain funding for the district's schools.

The measure needed two-thirds approval. It received 69 percent and, with it, funding to stave off millions of dollars in projected cuts in 2013-2014.

"I was proud to live where I live – where people support education," said Richard Harris, the outgoing Davis Joint Unified School District trustee, a key proponent of the measure.

Incumbent school board President Susan Lovenburg, who won re-election and supported Measure E, said she was "extremely pleased. We are very happy with the success of the measure."

Measure E, the fifth such measure brought before Davis voters since 2007, extends Measure A, a parcel tax pitched as an emergency funding measure two years ago. Measure A expires in 2013.

After absorbing millions of dollars in cuts since 2007-2008 and facing cuts of several million dollars more, district officials convinced Davis voters that the stakes were too high to turn back the latest tax measure.

Davis Unified School District leaders said the district would lose $3.2 million from the budget in 2013-14 if Measure E failed.

The district had planned an immediate $3.7 million cut from its 2012-13 budget, or about 5 percent of its total revenue, if Proposition 30 was defeated, district officials said.

"The renewal of Measure A, we put that in place as an emergency. That emergency hasn't gone away – the lack of state funding. We were able to maintain that with Measure E," Harris said. "We were looking at $7 million in cuts. That's what was on the line – 25 percent of the workforce. You take 100 FTEs (full-time employees) out of a district like ours and it would've been draconian."

But Proposition 30 – Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative to avert further cuts in K-12 school and community college funding – survived.

"We're stabilized. We're going to be at the whim of state funding, but this is a base we will have for the next four years," Harris said.

Not everyone was convinced by the dire scenario. Nearly one in three Davis voters rejected Measure E, with most of the no votes cast in the city's north and south areas.

And school board candidates openly fretted about tax fatigue in financially tight times for local families.

School board candidate and CSU Sacramento engineering professor Jose Granda vigorously opposed the measure, making its defeat a driving force in his campaign, saying that the school board leaned too heavily on voters' pocketbooks.

As results were still trickling in late Tuesday, he said the result showed school leaders that they need to curb spending and bring more fiscal discipline to the district.

But Granda failed to persuade voters to elect him to the board.

Harris said the vote affirms Davis' connection to its schools.

If Measure E had failed, "we wouldn't have been different than Anytown, Calif.," Harris said.

"We're not that. Schools are what drive the value of a community."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Darrell Smith



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals