Zhang Jun ZUMA24.com Photographers try to get a shot through the doors of the restricted access room as the House Intelligence Committee hears testimony on the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

0 comments | Print

Petraeus tells Congress that CIA account of Benghazi attack was altered

Published: Saturday, Nov. 17, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 7A
Last Modified: Sunday, Nov. 18, 2012 - 11:21 am

WASHINGTON – Former CIA Director David Petraeus told lawmakers Friday that the agency had secretly assessed that al-Qaida-linked gunmen attacked the U.S. Consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, but classified references to the terrorist group were cut from talking points on which U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice relied for television interviews.

Petraeus testified in closed hearings of the House and Senate intelligence committees a week after his startling admission to adultery and his resignation from the CIA roiled official Washington, igniting a scandal that grew to ensnare a Marine general who commands U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan.

Speaking after the back-to-back sessions, lawmakers said that Petraeus, a retired four-star Army general who once commanded the U.S.-led forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, apologized for his affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell. But the issue didn't figure at all in his testimony, they said.

"The general did not address any specifics of the affair, of that issue. What he did say in his opening statement was that he regrets the circumstances that led to his resignation," said Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I.

Petraeus was kept hidden from the media as he was escorted in and out of the hearings, which the committees held as they conduct two of four congressional investigations into the Benghazi attacks, which killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, another State Department staffer and two CIA contract security officers.

Republican lawmakers have led a political outcry over the killings. They've targeted Rice with charges that on five TV shows five days after the assaults, she cast the attacks as stemming from a spontaneous protest against an anti-Islam video and not as a terrorist operation, in a deliberate bid to protect President Barack Obama's record on terrorism in the closing weeks of his re-election campaign.

Several senior Republican senators, including John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said earlier this week that they'd oppose Rice if Obama nominates her to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who has made it clear that she doesn't want to stay on for the second term.

Petraeus, lawmakers said, told the committees that from the beginning the CIA had assessed that members of al-Qaida affiliates were involved in the assaults.

But the references to al-Qaida were struck from the final version of unclassified talking points that the intelligence community approved and then provided to Rice for her television appearances, they said.

"The original talking points prepared by the CIA were different from the ones that were finally put out ... even though it was clearly evident to the CIA that there was al-Qaida involvement," said Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. He added that the references to "al-Qaida involvement" were dropped for "indications of extremists."

King quoted Petraeus as saying he didn't know who made the revisions during a "long, interagency process."

A senior U.S. official who's familiar with the matter said the al-Qaida references were struck from the unclassified version because they came from secret sources. Moreover, the network's links to the attacks were tenuous, and making them public at that time could have skewed further intelligence-gathering and tainted an FBI criminal investigation into the attacks, the official said.

The unclassified talking points reflected what the CIA "believed at that point in time," said the senior U.S. official, who requested anonymity in order to discuss the sensitive issue. "The points were reviewed by CIA leadership and coordinated in the interagency at a senior level. The points were not, as has been insinuated by some, edited to minimize the role of extremists, diminish terrorist affiliations or play down that this was an attack. There were legitimate intelligence and legal issues to consider, as is almost always the case when explaining classified assessments publicly."

It remained unclear, however, why the CIA and the administration said there was a protest outside the consulate when Libya's interim president and local witnesses were saying none had taken place, and administration officials said at first that they couldn't confirm there was one.

Many lawmakers' post-hearing comments focused on Rice's treatment.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., lambasted Rice's critics, saying, "You don't pillory the person and select Ambassador Rice because she used an unclassified talking point to say she is unqualified to be secretary of state."

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals