0 comments | Print

Latest California state parks audit finds more mystery money

Published: Saturday, Dec. 22, 2012 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Sunday, Dec. 23, 2012 - 10:33 am

Another audit of the California Department of Parks and Recreation found yet more mystery money: $3.9 million in a fund for donations that had no assigned purpose.

The audit by the state Department of Finance, released Friday, found the money in the State Park Contingency Fund, which holds private donations to the park system. According to the rules governing the fund, each donation is supposed to have a purpose assigned so it is spent according to the donor's wishes. If the donor does not specify a purpose, the department is supposed to assign one.

But the Department of Finance found that 20 percent of the fund balance, totaling $3.9 million, had sat for years with no designated purpose.

In one example, $1.5 million had been parked in the fund since 2004. Although earning interest, the money has not been put to use to help the beleaguered park system.

"We haven't seen a lot of these type of funds, but it was a little surprising," said Frances Parmelee, audit manager at the Department of Finance.

The latest audit was triggered by news in July, first reported by The Bee, that the parks department had been sitting on nearly $54 million in two special funds for many years, even as it began closing 70 parks due to state budget cuts.

The "hidden money" was not reported to the Department of Finance as required by state budget rules. The revelation, on the heels of a scandal involving secret vacation buyouts at parks headquarters, prompted a housecleaning of parks leadership.

The new audit verifies there was $53.4 million in hidden money, putting to rest speculation that there might be more. It also concludes that the surplus existed as far back as 1993, longer than previously known. It may have existed even longer, Parmelee said, but auditors did not look back any further.

Among other findings:

• Executive management in the department exercised little oversight of budget staff.

• The department does not maintain written policies governing how staff calculates fund balances.

• Internal controls on state credit cards were inadequate. "Unallowable" purchases were identified in eight of 35 cases examined. In two cases, the employee who asked for purchase authorization also approved it.

In a written response, parks director Anthony L. Jackson said the department has adopted most of the audit's recommendations and is working to complete a corrective action plan within the requested 60 days. This will include deciding how to properly spend the unassigned $3.9 million.

The audit failed to answer a key lingering question: Why did state parks keep so much money hidden?

"We really couldn't determine the basis for why they were doing it," Parmelee said.

Parmelee said employees who might have the answer had been replaced, and available records shed no light on the issue. She said that question would be left to a separate investigation by the attorney general's office.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Matt Weiser



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals