Jon Ortiz

0 comments | Print

The State Worker: Foolproof predictions for the state workforce

Published: Thursday, Jan. 3, 2013 - 12:00 am | Page 3A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 - 8:13 pm

It looks like California has overspent by hundreds of millions of dollars on courthouse construction in Long Beach and roadwork in San Francisco. Meanwhile, a $371 million state payroll system upgrade is five years overdue and over budget.

We're certainly unqualified to predict examples of the state's nimble efficiency for the coming year, but here are 100-percent-guaranteed-accurate predictions for the year that just expired:

• Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown and his majority-party partners in the Legislature will change public pension benefits for state and local workers.

Aghast unions will holler that the August legislation is extreme. Hardcore pension reformers will yip the bill is more fluff than substance.

The folks most affected by the pension changes? They won't utter a peep. The new benefits formulas that require employees work longer and retire with fewer benefits won't be on the payroll until Jan. 1, 2013, or later, so they have no say.

• Just ahead of the August pension legislation, Brown will persuade nearly every state employee union to accept furloughs, even though their contracts call for regular hours and pay.

If former GOP Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, confronted with a much more severe budget deficit, had proposed a similar plan, the apoplectic unions would have said furloughs unfairly balanced the budget on their members' backs.

Wait. He did. And they did. About four years ago.

• The pension reform measure and furloughs will share a common political motive: Brown and his labor allies will want voters to hike taxes via a ballot measure aimed at easing serial budget crises.

The furloughs will buff Brown's governing-on-the-cheap image. The pension measure will attest that Democrats take California's finances seriously enough to whack retirements and risk upsetting their union base.

• With union money and muscle behind him, Brown will persuade voters to accept the tax hike proposal.

Labor unions will raise more than $60 million to promote Proposition 30, a temporary sales and income increase. They'll also lend strategic campaign expertise and put boots on the ground to get out the vote for Brown's measure.

Guess they weren't that upset after all.

• While winning Proposition 30 will be huge for the unions, they'll score an even bigger win by defeating a ballot measure that would end payroll-deducted funding for political purposes.

If passed, Proposition 32 would have tipped the balance of political power in Sacramento, since unions get all their political spending money from members' payroll deductions. Their traditional nemeses, business interests, don't.

The Yes on 30 and No on 32 campaigns will feed on each other. If you can get a voter supporting a tax hike, it's not much of a stretch to get that voter opposing the payroll measure. Brilliant, the political chattering class will conclude.

Almost as brilliant as flawlessly predicting events of 2012 – after the fact.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

Read more articles by Jon Ortiz



About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "Report Abuse" link below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "Report Abuse" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

• Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "Report Abuse" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them.

hide comments
Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older



Find 'n' Save Daily DealGet the Deal!

Local Deals